Talk:Barcombe: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:52, 22 April 2010

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

UK geography Start‑class Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sussex Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am gradually adding the fact that many Sussex villages are also civil parishes (CP), like Barcombe: there is a difference! In that case I have made it clear that the CP contains more than just Barcombe, which made the original a little unclear. I've included details of the old railway lines - again since they are more complicated than was originally suggested - and the Bluebell Line certainly isn't defunct!!! I also feel that to suggest readers might muddle up between Bal and Bar makes it more possible that they will, for no good reason as far as I can see, so I've toned that down. Finally: Domesday not Doomsday... Peter Shearan 10:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stff

yes there is only one villa and the bluebell line isn't run by national rail: so it's defunct! anyway I LIVE IN BARCOMBE so i should know more

Apology

Sorry I apologise for my rash attitude in 'Stff' I wasn't experienced in wikipedia then. If you require information about the railway of Barcombe and the surrounding area - I can be of great help. And the Bluebell Railway isn't operated by Network Rail it is a private heritage railway, so it is in effect a closed line as you can't buy a ticket from say Lewes to Sheffield Park. User:Charliedeacon

Roman Villas

THREE Roman villas? I only know of one. Does anybody have evidence for others?--QuestingVole 11:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements state that ideally the civil parish should be the catch-all article, avoiding single line articles on every village and landmark within the parish.

Therefore, I suggest that villages within the parish with a one or two sentence article, ie Barcombe Cross to be merged and redirected to this parish article. ++ MortimerCat (talk) 16:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
 {{WPUKgeo|class=Start|importance=Low}}
-{{WikiProject Sussex|importance=Mid|class=Start|needs-photo=yes}}
+{{WikiProject Sussex|importance=Mid|class=Start|needs-photo=no}}
 }}
-{{reqphoto|in=East Sussex}}
 I am gradually adding the fact that many Sussex villages are also civil parishes (CP), like Barcombe: there is a difference! In that case I have made it clear that the CP contains more than just Barcombe, which made the original a little unclear. I've included details of the old railway lines - again since they are more complicated than was originally suggested - and the Bluebell Line certainly isn't defunct!!! I also feel that to suggest readers might muddle up between Bal and Bar makes it more possible that they will, for no good reason as far as I can see, so I've toned that down. Finally: Domesday not Doomsday... [[User:Peter Shearan|Peter Shearan]] 10:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)