Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 April 15: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:04, 23 April 2010

< April 14	April 16 >

April 15

File:Stadium-Armory.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadium-Armory.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jshgoodwin (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons. Jheald (talk) 14:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? The image quality is horrible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:000000 Bullet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:000000 Bullet.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason (notify | contribs | uploads).

Apparently has no encyclopedic use (and isn't in use). Blurpeace 01:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's used by a MonoBook CSS skin of mine which I know some other people use (although I don't anymore). --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 12:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EDDIE MONEY -- I Wanna Go Back.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:14, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EDDIE MONEY -- I Wanna Go Back.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by AjaxSmack (notify | contribs | uploads).

Content of song not discussed in article. WP:NFC. This is (hopefully) a prompt to get some sourced commentary in the article. Dawnseeker2000 01:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Some additional commentary added. Sourcing is a problem but I'm not sure that collates with any fair use issue. — AjaxSmack 21:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - That's a pretty significant improvement to the article. I think that (all) articles will certainly grow, and that this article and the sound clip in particular probably meet the requirement for sourced commentary. Thanks a ton. You know, I don't really want these clips deleted; I'm just using this process to get more eyes on these things and help spur improvement. Dawnseeker2000 22:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fluke - Bubble Speechbubble.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fluke - Bubble Speechbubble.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Martin Hinks (notify | contribs | uploads).

Content of song not discussed in article. WP:NFC. This is (hopefully) a prompt to get some sourced commentary in the article. The article that this is used in is one sentence long. Dawnseeker2000 02:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baworowsky2008.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baworowsky2008.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Otto gefunkmeyer (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned file, its only use was in the now-deleted Andrew Baworowsky. — ξ ^xplicit 03:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gojihunter.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gojihunter.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Gojizilla (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 03:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:556868274 l.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:556868274 l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Arsone62 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Appears to be a promotional image of the Peter Toh, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright. — ξ ^xplicit 03:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:56.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:56.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Varunkyayaar (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned file no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 03:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:L'enfantPlaza.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'enfantPlaza.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jshgoodwin (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? The image quality is horrible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Armpit hair.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Armpit hair.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tanganica (notify | contribs | uploads).

Poor quality orphan. User self image, added to article 2 years ago but since removed by later editors. User no longer active. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. Haruth (talk) 07:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pubic hair.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pubic hair.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tanganica (notify | contribs | uploads).

Poor quality orphan. User self image, added to article 2 years ago but since removed by later editors. User no longer active. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. Haruth (talk) 07:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prague 1939 occupation.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prague 1939 occupation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Irpen (notify | contribs | uploads).

Quite why we need a non-free picture of a man driving a car to understand the invasion of Czechoslovakia is beyond me. We have plenty of free images of the event, this one appears to show nothing in particular (and doesn't seem to illustrate any particular point) and the rationale is unenlightening. J Milburn (talk) 09:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2000 test2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 test2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daanschr (notify | contribs | uploads).

Per uploading user response to request for description: These maps might be deleted if inappropriate, because the WikiProject where they belong to is non-active at the moment, due to a lack of participants. Also, these maps are not very notable for Wikipedia. They are called test, because they are part of a test to get the right borders in a map.Daanschr (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Haruth (talk) 10:04, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2000 test3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 test3.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daanschr (notify | contribs | uploads).

Per upload users response to request for description information: These maps might be deleted if inappropriate, because the WikiProject where they belong to is non-active at the moment, due to a lack of participants. Also, these maps are not very notable for Wikipedia. They are called test, because they are part of a test to get the right borders in a map.Daanschr (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Haruth (talk) 10:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2000 test4.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 test4.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daanschr (notify | contribs | uploads).

Per upload users response to request for description information: These maps might be deleted if inappropriate, because the WikiProject where they belong to is non-active at the moment, due to a lack of participants. Also, these maps are not very notable for Wikipedia. They are called test, because they are part of a test to get the right borders in a map.Daanschr (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Haruth (talk) 10:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2000 test5.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 test5.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daanschr (notify | contribs | uploads).

Per upload users response to request for description information: These maps might be deleted if inappropriate, because the WikiProject where they belong to is non-active at the moment, due to a lack of participants. Also, these maps are not very notable for Wikipedia. They are called test, because they are part of a test to get the right borders in a map.Daanschr (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Haruth (talk) 10:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2000 test7.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 test7.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Daanschr (notify | contribs | uploads).

Per upload users response to request for description information: These maps might be deleted if inappropriate, because the WikiProject where they belong to is non-active at the moment, due to a lack of participants. Also, these maps are not very notable for Wikipedia. They are called test, because they are part of a test to get the right borders in a map.Daanschr (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC) Haruth (talk) 10:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1958 Sakharov Kurchatov.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1958 Sakharov Kurchatov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Alex_Bakharev (notify | contribs | uploads).

WP:NFCC #1 and #8. It is not necessary to see a photo of these two individuals together to understand that they knew each other. No commentary on this image is offered in either subject's article. howcheng {chat} 16:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Staff josh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Staff josh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Djmatrundola (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, unencyclopedic, likely copyvio - considering past history of uploader, was used in a now deleted advert -FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sir James Black.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir James Black.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by HJ_Mitchell (notify | contribs | uploads).

WP:NFC#Unacceptable uses images #6 -- BBC photo. howcheng {chat} 21:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll save you some time. I was unaware of that criterion when I uploaded the image, but I've put a G7 tag on it now so people don;t have to waste their time commenting here! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2010_April_15&oldid=357780138"

Archived files for deletion discussions