Talk:Pleasantville (film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:47, 19 January 2006

Just wondering, what is the jazz music that is playing in the backround in the scene where the teens ask Bud what's outside Pleasantville?- B-101 1 July 2005 14:40 (UTC)

It's playing right now on TBS in the other room. I don't know what scenes they are in, but I have heard both "Take Five" from Dave Brubeck's Time out and "So What" from Miles Davis's Kind of Blue. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 21:26, July 9, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it is Take Five from Dave Brubeck. Pils 20:49, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic film. Do you know what the music is when they're looking through the art book? It plays again when they look at the mural. Oh, and do you think the colour-divided scenes are more based on the film of To Kill a Mockingbird, as the article currently states, or the book, or even the basic ideas and practices as brought to many young, modern people's attention by the film?

The final song is also a big surprise. Covers are usually worse than the original and covering a Beatles song is an especially dangerous thing to do, but this version of 'Across the Universe' is even better than the original! DirkvdM 09:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Social comment?

I just moved the tagline up because it's not really a spoiler and actually a good indication of the kind of film it is for people who consider watching it. And for those who are put off by the start, which is rather tacky and gives the wrong idea about what kind of film it is. But isn't there more social comment than just the colour thing and resistance to change? It comments on US society, and I don't know too much about that. But isn't there also something about the prosecution of 'communists' by McCarthy? And I can't remember now, but I noticed several other things while watching the film.

By the way, the buildup is a bit like Fidel (film), just in reverse. Both start in one mode and then switch to the opposite. 'Fidel' starts off very pro-Castro and ends very anti-Castro. In Pleasantville that isn't as strong, but I suspect there might be the intention to catch the interrest of people who liked the 'atmospere' of the 50's that others find so oppressive and then exposes the bad aspects of it. Or am I reading too much in this? DirkvdM 09:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Social comment?==
-I just moved the tagline up because it's not really a spoiler and actually a godd indication of the kind of film it is for people who consider watching it. And those who are put off by the start, which is rather tacky and give sthe wrong idea. But isn't there more social comment than just the colour thing and resistance to change? It comments on US society, and I don't know too much about that. But isn't there also something about the prosecution of 'communists' by McCarthy? And I canb't remember now, but I noticed several other things while watching the film.
+I just moved the tagline up because it's not really a spoiler and actually a good indication of the kind of film it is for people who consider watching it. And for those who are put off by the start, which is rather tacky and gives the wrong idea about what kind of film it is. But isn't there more social comment than just the colour thing and resistance to change? It comments on US society, and I don't know too much about that. But isn't there also something about the prosecution of 'communists' by McCarthy? And I can't remember now, but I noticed several other things while watching the film.
-Buy the way, the buildup is a bit like [[Fidel!]], just in reverse. Both start in one mode and then switch to the opposite. Fidel! starts off very pro-Castro and ends very anti-Castro. In Pleasantville that isn't as strong, but I suspect there might be the intention to catch the interrest of people who liked the 'atmospere' of the 50's that others find so oppressive and then exposes the bad aspects of it. Or am I reading too much in this? [[User:DirkvdM|DirkvdM]] 09:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
+By the way, the buildup is a bit like [[Fidel (film)]], just in reverse. Both start in one mode and then switch to the opposite. 'Fidel' starts off very pro-Castro and ends very anti-Castro. In Pleasantville that isn't as strong, but I suspect there might be the intention to catch the interrest of people who liked the 'atmospere' of the 50's that others find so oppressive and then exposes the bad aspects of it. Or am I reading too much in this? [[User:DirkvdM|DirkvdM]] 09:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)