Jump to content

Talk:Emperor Xuan of Han: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Solv (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
ListasBot (talk | contribs)
Made fixes to listas tag.
Line 2: Line 2:
|living=no
|living=no
|class=Start
|class=Start
|listas=Han, Emperor Xuan Of
|priority=Mid
|priority=Mid
|listas=Han, Emperor Xuan of
}}
}}
{{WPCHINA|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WPCHINA|class=Start|importance=Mid}}

Revision as of 22:10, 24 April 2010

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconChina Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dates for Emperor Xuan's son Liu Yu (Prince of Dongping)

I believe the date of his death should be either 19 or 20 BCE, not 29 as stated in the article. His biography in the History of the Former Han (Hanshu) states that he reigned for 33 years (Zhonghua shuju edition, p.3325). Loewe (Biographical Dictionary of the Qin and Former Han) gives his death-date as 20 BCE, so I would probably go with that. I assume 29 is an arithmetic mistake.EstherPark 17:01, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 23:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voodoo?

Is this term appropriate here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.206.93 (talkcontribs)

Perhaps, perhaps not (part of the reason why it appeared natural is that, oddly enough, the Chinese term (巫蠱, wū gǔ) is phonetically not far from "voodoo." The practice also was very similar to some actual voodoo practices, in that dolls were used. Per your objection, however, I've changed it to "witchcraft." --Nlu (talk) 21:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]