Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iranian sex tape scandal: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
FleetCommand (talk | contribs) Creating deletion discussion page for Iranian sex tape scandal. (TW) |
Umbralcorax (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{findsources|Iranian sex tape scandal}}) |
:({{findsources|Iranian sex tape scandal}}) |
||
Delete per [[WP:LIBEL]]: This article is libelous; it accuses of a living person of a serious social misconduct/crime based on '''speculations''' of the media while no legal authority has even charged the said person of that said crime. Wikipedia is not publisher of libelous speculations. [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 04:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
Delete per [[WP:LIBEL]]: This article is libelous; it accuses of a living person of a serious social misconduct/crime based on '''speculations''' of the media while no legal authority has even charged the said person of that said crime. Wikipedia is not publisher of libelous speculations. [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 04:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''weak keep'''- with a possible re-write. I'm basing this mostly on the effect that it had on the society, up to and including the legislation in reaction to it. That seems to me to be an indicator of lasting notability. That said, if there is anything in there that is libelous, it should be immediately edited out. But as long as its sourced in reliable sources, I don't know if I see a problem. [[User:Umbralcorax|Umbralcorax]] ([[User talk:Umbralcorax|talk]]) 04:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:29, 25 April 2010
- Iranian sex tape scandal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete per WP:LIBEL: This article is libelous; it accuses of a living person of a serious social misconduct/crime based on speculations of the media while no legal authority has even charged the said person of that said crime. Wikipedia is not publisher of libelous speculations. Fleet Command (talk) 04:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- weak keep- with a possible re-write. I'm basing this mostly on the effect that it had on the society, up to and including the legislation in reaction to it. That seems to me to be an indicator of lasting notability. That said, if there is anything in there that is libelous, it should be immediately edited out. But as long as its sourced in reliable sources, I don't know if I see a problem. Umbralcorax (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)