Talk:Congratulations (album): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:19, 28 April 2010

Albums Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Refrain from Adding Time Lengths

Until the album is distributed through the market, or until a source can be presented that is not a torrent site, or where the time lengths of the song can be shown, refrain from adding any time lengths to this article. Amongst doing so, your edit will immediately be reverted.--F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 23:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Professional Reviews

We all know that there are going to be lots of reviews for this album and that some of them will be unavoidably omitted for this article (10 is the maximum). The only reference we have for the Mojo, Q Magazine and Uncut reviews is a link from Any Decent Music (http://www.anydecentmusic.com/review/1662/Congratulations.aspx) which does not provide sufficient info such as editor, page and issue of the magazine.

I have gathered a bunch of other reviews which are available online and could replace those three if nobody is able to provide the required info. BBC Music: http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/fqcg

The Fly: http://www.the-fly.co.uk/words/reviews/album-reviews/7418/album-review:-mgmt

About.com: http://altmusic.about.com/od/reviews/fr/mgmt-congratulations.htm

The Sydney Morning Herald: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/music/mgmt--congratulations-20100401-rh92.html

Please add any official reviews you find online here so that we can decide on which of them to include in the article. --Spacealigned (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is Allmusic review: http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:gzfrxzrsldte I think it must be included. Ferrumoff (talk) 13:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Allmusic, as much as I loathe them, their review is rather an important one. Should we consider replacing Q for Allmusic then based on the argument stated above?--F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 13:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Released on the 12th April

Perhaps only in the UK, the album was released yesterday, not today. There were adverts in NME stating the release as the 12th, and it was available in high street shops from the 12th.

Source?--F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 17:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's normal for new albums to be released in the UK on a Monday (the 12th was a Monday). Tuesday seems more normal in the US. 82.43.158.82 (talk) 12:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wtf

is up with the album artwork?

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 :Source?--[[User:F-22 Raptored|<span style="color:#557777">F-22 Raptör</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:F-22 Raptored|<span style="color:#0B5394;" font="Stencil">Aces High</span>]]♠</sup> 17:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 ::It's normal for new albums to be released in the UK on a Monday (the 12th was a Monday). Tuesday seems more normal in the US. [[Special:Contributions/82.43.158.82|82.43.158.82]] ([[User talk:82.43.158.82|talk]]) 12:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
+== wtf ==
+is up with the album artwork?