Jump to content

Talk:John D. Rockefeller Jr.: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m Tagging, (Plugin++), replaced: talkheader → talk header using AWB
ListasBot (talk | contribs)
Synchronized listas with DEFAULTSORT from article.
Line 2: Line 2:
{{WPBiography
{{WPBiography
|living=no
|living=no
|class= Start
|class=Start
|priority=
|listas=Rockefeller Jr, John D.
|politician-work-group=yes
|politician-work-group=yes
|listas=Rockefeller, John D., Jr.
|priority=
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Virginia|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Virginia|class=Start}}

Revision as of 05:48, 4 May 2010

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
WikiProject iconVirginia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Years

Trying to make some sort of sense to the timeline. I do think ths article is biased —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.160.62.97 (talk) 06:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Another sugarcoated wikipedia article

About 4/5 of the article just talks about how much money he gave to the poor, and what a great man he was and blah blah blah. Listen: You DO NOT become the richest man by being nice to people. Period.

Wikipedia: you are loosing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.111.217 (talk) 16:32, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mrjonathan2000 (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC) While he or she may be losing it, it is true that these articles are limited to positive aspects. Rockerfeller's involvement in Eugenics, social Darwinism, depopulation (now known as population control), and funding of organizations doing illegal bio testing should be included in this article. The information is quite available and is easily accessible through the Google timeline. I don't have time to do the research though.[reply]

http://www.google.com/search?q=rockefeller+eugenics&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=NUs&tbs=tl:1&tbo=u&ei=ErPSSoCnN8WNkAXy2Oj_Aw&sa=X&oi=timeline_result&ct=title&resnum=11&ved=0CCMQ5wIwCg

Mrjonathan2000 (talk) 05:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

co founder of Colonial Williamsburg

The man was the co founder of Colonial Williamsburg. Vaoverland 18:16, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

this is a little late, but why not add that to the article yourself? Travb (talk) 07:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

awwwwwwwwwwwwww

gee what a great guy he is. hes just the most purest most nicest man ever. another sugarcoated wikipedia article, for shame, tsk tsk. Manic Hispanic 06:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. My lack of knowledge about him impedes me from helping, but some sort of criticism should be acknowledged. ChocoRokk (talk) 04:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seperate Criticism section is needed

This man was a very powerful business leader; a criticism section is vital. I had to search for any mention of (eg.) Ludlow Massacre, because of how well interwoven it is (intentionally to prevent prominence of it? possible bias...) Anywho, let's get seperate and quality criticism section going..