Jump to content

User talk:66.213.10.5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Proposed deletion of Kali's teeth bracelet. (TW)
AfD nomination of Kali's teeth bracelet. (TW)
Line 128: Line 128:


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Stillwaterising|Stillwaterising]] ([[User talk:Stillwaterising|talk]]) 14:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Stillwaterising|Stillwaterising]] ([[User talk:Stillwaterising|talk]]) 14:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] nomination of [[:Kali's teeth bracelet]] ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[Kali's teeth bracelet]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali's teeth bracelet&#32; (2nd nomination)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:Stillwaterising|Stillwaterising]] ([[User talk:Stillwaterising|talk]]) 17:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:04, 6 May 2010

March 2007

Vandalism of MOO

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Limmy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hut 8.5 20:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice


Your recent edit to Limmy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Your recent edit to Penn Station (restaurant) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Limmy, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. NickContact/Contribs 20:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

Chow Chow

Reverted vandalism from this IP. --Brownings 22:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Slipknot (band) page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kungfu Adam (talk) 23:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Battle.net, you will be blocked from editing. --Kbdank71 18:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Resident Evil: The Umbrella Chronicles, you will be blocked from editing. Oysterguitarist~Talk 15:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rock Lee, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 18:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Geniac 19:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ronald Reagan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 20:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from American Bulldog. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drivenapart (talk) 09:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Hotmail, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shinpah1 (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2008

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Hamlet. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lradrama 20:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matt Parkman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Matt Parkman was changed by 66.213.10.5 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-19T18:07:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to S.T.A.R.S. Members (Resident Evil), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Halmstad, Talk:Halmstad 13:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Dream Theater, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Wisdom89 (T / C) 19:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Endicott, New York. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Krellis (Talk) 17:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Oorah‎ appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Really Really Free Market has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/rrfmcincinnati/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:17, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jaden Smith has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=418099599&albumID=60089&imageID=3972150") . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories soundtrack has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Bachata (music). Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User talk:Trorov has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Rschen7754 (T C) 23:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2010 Haiti earthquake, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--Tone 21:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Rooster has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Heracles31 (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Cockfight. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Stuff for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. NeilN talk to me 22:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Waka Flocka Flame, you will be blocked from editing. [1] Yappy2bhere (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Book has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Book. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --RrburkeekrubrR 22:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kali's teeth bracelet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources. Does not meet GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stillwaterising (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Kali's teeth bracelet, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali's teeth bracelet (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stillwaterising (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]