User talk:64.222.110.145: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::Actually, That isn't what the source says, please see the talk page before reverting my edits. [[Special:Contributions/64.222.110.145|64.222.110.145]] ([[User talk:64.222.110.145#top|talk]]) 17:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
::::Actually, That isn't what the source says, please see the talk page before reverting my edits. [[Special:Contributions/64.222.110.145|64.222.110.145]] ([[User talk:64.222.110.145#top|talk]]) 17:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::::Actually, it is: "Last year, the New Oxford American Dictionary picked locavore as its word of the year."<span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 17:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
:::::Actually, it is: "Last year, the New Oxford American Dictionary picked locavore as its word of the year."<span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 17:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::::: Oh, <i>that</i> source. Well it's a pity the dictionary couldn't get it right, but if that's how it stands, then we ought to include it, thanks for bringing that to my attention. I thought it was just some troll with a bee in their bonnet about local foods trying to make it seem crazy. |
:::::: Oh, <i>that</i> source. Well it's a pity the dictionary couldn't get it right, but if that's how it stands, then we ought to include it, thanks for bringing that to my attention. I thought it was just some troll with a bee in their bonnet about local foods trying to make it seem crazy. [[Special:Contributions/64.222.110.145|64.222.110.145]] ([[User talk:64.222.110.145#top|talk]]) 17:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to [[:Local food]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|cite references or sources]] or discuss the changes on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 --> <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 17:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to [[:Local food]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you believe the information you added was correct, please [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|cite references or sources]] or discuss the changes on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-error2 --> <span style="font-family: Papyrus">[[User:RolandR|RolandR]] ([[User talk:RolandR|talk]])</span> 17:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:23, 10 May 2010
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
May 2010
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Local food. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 08:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
- On the contrary I was actually correcting incorrect information. The proper form of word is "localvore" a portmanteau of the english word "local" and the suffix "-vore", Latin meaning 'to devour'. It is not "locavore" which would be a portmanteau of "loca", which is Spanish for crazy and "-vore". That is something completely different! I appreciate your concern and I know that you reverted my edit in good faith, I can assure you there are no hard feelings :) Happy editing! 64.222.110.145 (talk) 16:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- The point is, not what you consider to be the correct form, but what the source states. According to the source, a dictionary listed "locavore" as a word of the year. If tyou think ythe dictionary is wrong, argue with them; if you think the newspaper is wrong, argue with them. In either case, our role here is to repeat what a reliable source stated, not to "correct" this. RolandR (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, That isn't what the source says, please see the talk page before reverting my edits. 64.222.110.145 (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, it is: "Last year, the New Oxford American Dictionary picked locavore as its word of the year."RolandR (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, that source. Well it's a pity the dictionary couldn't get it right, but if that's how it stands, then we ought to include it, thanks for bringing that to my attention. I thought it was just some troll with a bee in their bonnet about local foods trying to make it seem crazy. 64.222.110.145 (talk) 17:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, it is: "Last year, the New Oxford American Dictionary picked locavore as its word of the year."RolandR (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, That isn't what the source says, please see the talk page before reverting my edits. 64.222.110.145 (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- The point is, not what you consider to be the correct form, but what the source states. According to the source, a dictionary listed "locavore" as a word of the year. If tyou think ythe dictionary is wrong, argue with them; if you think the newspaper is wrong, argue with them. In either case, our role here is to repeat what a reliable source stated, not to "correct" this. RolandR (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Local food. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
- Roland, did you read what i just wrote here? You're getting all in a tizzy about nothing. Why can't I post any comments on your talk page? 64.222.110.145 (talk) 17:08, 10 May 2010 (UTC)