Jump to content

Food, Inc.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
mNo edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
[[Monsanto]] has engineered and patented crops that are resistant to their trademarked herbicide [[roundup]]. Because they have patented this crop if some external force, such as the wind or animals, unintentionally brings seeds to a non-Monsanto approved farm then that farmer can be sued for infringement. Furthermore if a farmer reuses the seeds that his [[Monsanto]] crops produced then again the farmer can be sued for infringement.
[[Monsanto]] has engineered and patented crops that are resistant to their trademarked herbicide [[roundup]]. Because they have patented this crop if some external force, such as the wind or animals, unintentionally brings seeds to a non-Monsanto approved farm then that farmer can be sued for infringement. Furthermore if a farmer reuses the seeds that his [[Monsanto]] crops produced then again the farmer can be sued for infringement.


Currently in the USA approximately 30% of the land base is dedicated to producing corn. This abundance of corn production is achieved due to subsides that the USA provides corn farmers, allowing corn to be produced below the cost of production. Companies such as [[Tyson Foods]] and [[Smithfield Foods]] have corporate interests in producing cheap corn and have successfully lobbied congress to produced the farm bill that are currently enforced.
Currently in the USA approximately 30% of the land base is dedicated to producing corn. This abundance of corn production is achieved due to subsides that the USA provides corn farmers, allowing corn to be produced below the cost of production. Companies such as [[Tyson Foods]] and [[Smithfield Foods]] have corporate interests in producing cheap corn and have successfully lobbied congress to produce the farm bill that is currently enforced.


<ref> Food Inc - 2008 </ref>
<ref> Food Inc - 2008 </ref>

Revision as of 22:28, 10 May 2010

Food, Inc.
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRobert Kenner
Produced byRobert Kenner
Elise Pearlstein
StarringEric Schlosser
Michael Pollan
Edited byKim Roberts
Distributed byMagnolia Pictures
Alliance Films (Canada)
Release dates
September 7, 2008 (TIFF)
March 27, 2009 (Argentina)
June 12, 2009 (U.S.)
June 19, 2009 (Canada)
Running time
94 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Box office$4,467,205[1]

Food, Inc. is a 2009 American documentary film directed by Emmy Award-winning filmmaker Robert Kenner.[2] The film examines corporate farming in the United States, concluding that the meat and vegetables produced by agribusiness have many hidden costs and are unhealthy and environmentally-harmful. The film is narrated by Michael Pollan and Eric Schlosser.[3][4] The documentary generated extensive controversy in that it was heavily criticized by large American corporations engaged in industrial food production.[2]

Content

The film's first segment examines the industrial production of meat (chicken, beef, and pork), calling it inhumane and economically and environmentally unsustainable.[2][5] The second segment looks at the industrial production of grains and vegetables (primarily corn and soy beans), again labeling this economically and environmentally unsustainable.[2][5] The film's third and final segment is about the economic and legal power of the major food companies, such as food libel laws, whose livelihoods are based on supplying cheap but contaminated food, the heavy use of petroleum-based chemicals (largely pesticides and fertilizers), and the promotion of unhealthy food consumption habits by the American public.[2][5]

Specifics

Below is an incomplete list of specific ideas that the film mentions.

Chickens have been raised to grow faster, larger, and with bigger breasts. Such increases can lead to the chicken's skeletal and muscular architecture to be inadequate at supporting the chicken's increased weight. This, among other things, can lead to the chicken's legs breaking and losing the ability to walk which often leads to death.

The average chicken farmer employed by multinational corporation such as Tyson makes about $18,000 a year. However in order to make company standards they have on average invested $300,000 per chicken house with continuing mandatory upgrades. One of these such upgrades includes "closed houses" so that the chickens have no or little contact with the sun throughout their lives.

Often times cattle are enclosed in extremely small areas. When the cows defecate the fecal matter has no where to go so it remains in the cattle's living area. Over the lifetime of the cattle the fecal matter builds up and the cattle have to live in mounds, often several feet high, of their own feces. When slaughtered the cattle have feces all over their body so bacteria from the fecal matter can enter the meat and possibly contaminate it.

Monsanto has engineered and patented crops that are resistant to their trademarked herbicide roundup. Because they have patented this crop if some external force, such as the wind or animals, unintentionally brings seeds to a non-Monsanto approved farm then that farmer can be sued for infringement. Furthermore if a farmer reuses the seeds that his Monsanto crops produced then again the farmer can be sued for infringement.

Currently in the USA approximately 30% of the land base is dedicated to producing corn. This abundance of corn production is achieved due to subsides that the USA provides corn farmers, allowing corn to be produced below the cost of production. Companies such as Tyson Foods and Smithfield Foods have corporate interests in producing cheap corn and have successfully lobbied congress to produce the farm bill that is currently enforced.

[6]

Production

Michael Pollan was a consultant and appears in the film, Eric Schlosser co-produced and appears in the film, and Participant Media (which also produced Al Gore's 2006 documentary, An Inconvenient Truth) was the production company.[2] The film took three years to make.[7][8] Director Kenner claims that he spent large amounts of his budget on legal fees to try to protect himself against lawsuits from industrial food producers, pesticide and fertilizer manufacturers, and other companies criticized in the film.[7]

An extensive marketing campaign was undertaken to promote the film. A companion book, Food Inc.: A Participant Guide: How Industrial Food Is Making Us Sicker, Fatter, and Poorer—And What You Can Do About It, was released in May 2009.[4][9][10] Stonyfield Farm, an organic yogurt maker located in New Hampshire, promoted the film printing information about it on the foil lids of 10 million cups of its yogurt in June 2009.[11][12]

Releases and box office

The film was shown as a "sneak-peek" at the True/False Film Festival in Columbia, Missouri, in February 2009.[13] It also screened at several film festivals in the spring before opening commercially in the United States on June 12, 2009, in New York City, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.[5][14] It made $61,400 in its first week.[15] It expanded to an additional 51 theaters in large cities in the U.S. and Canada on June 19.[5][10][14][16][17] It made an additional $280,000 its second weekend.[16]

The film was due to be released in the United Kingdom in the summer of 2009.[18] It is now scheduled for release on 12 February 2010.[19]

Controversy

The film has generated controversy for its views.[2][5] The producers invited on-screen rebuttals from Monsanto Company, Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods, Perdue Farms, and other companies, but all declined the invitation.[14][20][21] Monsanto says it invited the filmmakers to a producers' trade show,[22] but they claimed that they were denied press credentials at the event, and were not permitted to attend.[23] An alliance of food production companies (led by the American Meat Institute) created a Web site, SafeFoodInc.org,[24] in response to the claims made in the film.[5][10][20][25] Monsanto also established its own Web site to specifically respond to the film's claims about that company's products and actions.[2][21][26] Cargill told the Minneapolis Star Tribune that the company welcomed "differing viewpoints on how global agriculture can affordably nourish the world while minimizing environmental impact, ensuring food safety, guaranteeing food accessibility and providing meaningful work in agricultural communities."[27] But the company criticized the film's "'one-size-fits-all' answers to a task as complex as nourishing 6 billion people who are so disparately situated across the world."[27]

Fast-food chain Chipotle responded to the documentary in July 2009 by offering free screenings of it at various locations nationwide and stating that it does things differently, which it hopes customers will appreciate after seeing Food, Inc.[28]

The film's director, Robert Kenner, has denied attacking the current system of producing food, noting in one interview: "All we want is transparency and a good conversation about these things."[29] In the same interview, he went on to say, "...the whole system is made possible by government subsidies to a few huge crops like corn. It's a form of socialism that's making us sick."[29]

Critical reception

The film has been highly rated by critics collectively, with a combined rating of 97% on Rotten Tomatoes[30], and 80/100 on Metacritic.[31] The Staten Island Advance called the documentary "excellent" and "sobering," concluding, "Documentaries work when they illuminate, when they alter how we think, which renders Food, Inc. a solid success, and a must-see."[32] The Toronto Sun called it "terrifying" and "frankly riveting".[17] The San Francisco Examiner was equally positive, calling the film "visually stylish" and "One of the year’s most important films..."[33] The paper called the picture's approach to its controversial subject matter "a dispassionate appeal to common sense" and applauded its "painstaking research and thoughtful, evenhanded commentary..."[33] The Los Angeles Times, too, praised Food, Inc.'s cinematography, and called the film "eloquent" and "essential viewing".[34] The Montreal Gazette noted that despite the film's focus on American food manufacture, the film is worth viewing by anyone living in a country where large-scale food production occurs.[4] The paper's reviewer declared Food, Inc. "must-see", but also cautioned that some of the scenes are " not for the faint of heart."[4] The St. Louis Post-Dispatch noted that other documentaries and books have examined similar issues before. However, the film was still worth seeing: "The food-conglomerate angle was covered in a less-ambitious documentary called King Corn, and a more-ambitious documentary called The Corporation touched on the menace of the multinationals; but this one hits the sweet spot, and it does it with style."[35] The review concluded that the most powerful portion of the film focused on Monsanto's pursuit of legal action against farmers who improperly save and resell or replant Monsanto’s patented seed, in violation of a signed stewardship agreement and contract not to save and resell or replant seeds produced from the crops they grow from Monsanto seed.[26][35]

The San Francisco Chronicle, while noting the film has a "flair for the dramatic," concluded: "...it throws out one zinger after another, making its case with the methodical and unremitting force of muckrakers trying to radicalize—or at least rouse—a dozing populace."[3] Other reviews have not been as positive. A commentator at Forbes magazine found the film compelling but incomplete. The picture, the reviewer found, "fails to address how we might feed the country—or world" on the sustainable agriculture model advocated by the filmmakers, and that it failed to address critical issues of cost and access.[22] The Washington Times said the movie was "hamstrung" because few corporate executives wished to be interviewed by the documentarians, although it agreed that the film was trying to aim for balance.[36]

Awards

The film tied for fourth place as best documentary at the 35th Seattle International Film Festival. [37]

The film was nominated for best documentary in the 82nd Academy Awards,[38] but lost to The Cove.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Food, Inc." BoxOfficeMojo.com. February 27, 2010. Accessed 2009-02-27.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Severson, Kim. "Eat, Drink, Think, Change." The New York Times. June 3, 2009.
  3. ^ a b Biancolli, Amy. "Review: 'Food, Inc.' Not for the Squeamish." San Francisco Chronicle. June 12, 2009.
  4. ^ a b c d Chesterman, Lesley. "A Film That Will Make You Think Before You Eat." Montreal Gazette. June 20, 2009.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g "New Film Offers Troubling View of US Food Industry." Associated Press. June 7, 2009.
  6. ^ Food Inc - 2008
  7. ^ a b Simmons, Krista. "What Really Goes Into the Bag: Behind the Movie 'Food, Inc.'." Los Angeles Times. June 7, 2009.
  8. ^ There is some dispute as to how long the film was in production. In another interview, director Robert Kenner claims the film took six years to make. See: Math, Mara. "The Right to Know About What We Eat." San Francisco Examiner. June 11, 2009.
  9. ^ Food Inc.: A Participant Guide: How Industrial Food Is Making Us Sicker, Fatter, and Poorer—And What You Can Do About It. Karl Weber, ed. New York: PublicAffairs, 2009. ISBN 1586486942
  10. ^ a b c Levine, Allen. "Little Ag vs. Big Ag? Best Bet On Both." St. Paul Pioneer Press. June 18, 2009.
  11. ^ "'Food, Inc.' Gets Promo on Yogurt Lids." The Hollywood Reporter. June 11, 2009.
  12. ^ Marrero, Diana. "Sensenbrenner Cow Tax Fears Come Out of Thin Air." Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. June 13, 2009.
  13. ^ "Food, Inc." True/False Film Festival. No date. Accessed 2009-07-31.
  14. ^ a b c Deardorff, Julie. "Food, Inc.: How Factory Farming Affects You." Chicago Tribune. June 12, 2009.
  15. ^ "Good Buzz Wins Out As 'Hangover,' 'Up' Dominate Box Office Once Again." Los Angeles Times. June 14, 2009; Germain, David. "'Hangover' Hangs On As No. 1 Movie With $33.4M." Associated Press. June 14, 2009.
  16. ^ a b Kilday, Gregg. "'Proposal' Accepted at the Box Office." The Hollywood Reporter. June 21, 2009.
  17. ^ a b Braun, Liz. "You'll Choke On This Info." Toronto Sun. June 19, 2009.
  18. ^ Rayner, Jay. "Food Is the New Fur for the Celebrity With a Conscience." The Observer. June 14, 2009.
  19. ^ "UK Film release schedule - past, present and future". www.launchingfilms.com. 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-10.
  20. ^ a b Kearney, Christine. "Film Aims to Expose Dangers in U.S. Food Industry." Reuters. June 9, 2009.
  21. ^ a b Gustin, Georgina. "'Food, Inc.' Chews Up Monsanto, Agribusiness Cousins." St. Louis Post-Dispatch. June 26, 2009.
  22. ^ a b Ruiz, Rebecca. "What Food Activists Ignore." Forbes. June 11, 2009.
  23. ^ The trade show operators said they did not maintain records on rejected requests for press credentials. See: Gustin, "'Food, Inc.' Chews Up Monsanto, Agribusiness Cousins," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 26, 2009.
  24. ^ SafeFoodInc.org Web site. Accessed 2009-06-07.
  25. ^ "Web Site Takes on 'Food Inc'." Pork Magazine. June 12, 2009; Levin, Ann. "'Food Inc.' Has Sickening View of Food Industry." Associated Press. June 21, 2009.
  26. ^ a b Monsanto site about the movie Food, Inc. Accessed 2009-06-07.
  27. ^ a b "Cargill's Response to 'Food Inc.'." Minneapolis Star Tribune. June 20, 2009.
  28. ^ "Free Food – Food, Inc., That Is". Zagat.com. July 9, 2009.
  29. ^ a b Birdsall, John. "A Conversation with 'Food, Inc.' Director Robert Kenner." San Francisco Weekly. June 12, 2009.
  30. ^ "Food, Inc. (2009)" RottenTomatoes.com No date. Accessed 2009-11-19.
  31. ^ "Food, Inc." Metacritic.com No date. Accessed 2009-11-19.
  32. ^ Hill, Todd. "'Food, Inc.,' 'Moon' Top This Week's Alternatives to Mainstream Movies." Staten Island Advance. June 12, 2009.
  33. ^ a b Drake, Rossiter. "Here's Why Food Is Factory Fresh." San Francisco Examiner. June 12, 2009.
  34. ^ Goldstein, Gary. "Movie Review: 'Food, Inc.'" Los Angeles Times. June 12, 2009.
  35. ^ a b Williams, Joe. "'Food, Inc.'" St. Louis Post-Dispatch. June 26, 2009.
  36. ^ Bunch, Sonny. "Moore Worry Haunts Cinema." The Washington Times. June 19, 2009.
  37. ^ Kilday, Gregg. "Seattle Fest Announces Winners." The Hollywood Reporter. June 14, 2009.
  38. ^ http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jRVI5z29NpqyM5-jQIAj8RZGJvpQ
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Food,_Inc.&oldid=361361925"