Talk:Vicky Cristina Barcelona: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:55, 16 May 2010

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LEFTIST DOGMA

IF SOMEONE SEXUALLY ABUSES MINORS *AND MAKES DECENT ART* THEN THEY CAN MAKE CLICHE, SHODDY COMPLETELY UNORIGINAL DRIVEL AND YOU GUYS WON'T EVEN PUT UP CRITICISM. As long as secular/"liberals" can feel good about being sluts I guess!

Issues

I deleted the bit about Scarlett appearing in more Woody Allen movies than any actor since Mia. Judy Davis anyone (four since 1990)?

Does Joan Pera realy appear in the film?--Felixllopart (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't the opening bit need changing? Surely it won the Golden Globe in 2009. 66.217.131.82 (talk) 04:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

This article seems to be based on this copyrighted article. http://www.pics24h.com/directors-and-actors/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vapour (talk • contribs) 08:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Looks like the other way round. The link you gave was posted on February 7, 2009. The plot here is more than six months old. ^LeaveSleaves 17:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think a fair and interesting comment on the movie is being constantly deleted by someone (Sleaves?) for no legitimate reason. The comment is available at http://independentindian.com/2009/03/21/is-vicky-cristina-barcelona-referring-to-an-emasculation-of-elite-american-society/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seekers2008 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==LEFTIST DOGMA==
 IF SOMEONE SEXUALLY ABUSES MINORS *AND MAKES DECENT ART* THEN THEY CAN MAKE CLICHE, SHODDY COMPLETELY UNORIGINAL DRIVEL AND YOU GUYS WON'T EVEN PUT UP CRITICISM.
+As long as secular/"liberals" can feel good about being sluts I guess!
 ==Issues==