User talk:Force101: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:46, 19 May 2010

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 00:30, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion at WP:ANI#Another chance?, I've allowed you access to edit your talk page. If you wish to be a constructive editor, then you need to first post an unblock request here, demonstrating in the request that you understand why you were blocked and commit to not reoffending. Please do not use the other account you created in the meantime. Once you are unblocked, discussion can take place as to which account you will use, and whether or not you wish to make a clean break from this account. Mjroots (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Force101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I, user of Force101 ,Wish to be unblocked from having been blocked because of sockpuppetry and will no longer make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia .--Brian Greenwell 16:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Force 101

Decline reason:

This is not persuasive. Why should we trust you now? Sandstein 20:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason you should trust me now is because i haven't made any unconstructive edits in months!-and i don't plan to any time soon.--Force101 02:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Force101

Revision as of 22:31, 18 May 2010 edit Elockid (talk \| contribs) 42,430 edits Undid revision 362877271 by Elockid (talk) forget what I said ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:46, 19 May 2010 edit undo Force101 (talk \| contribs) 113 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	{{unblock reviewed\|1=I, user of Force101 ,Wish to be unblocked from having been blocked because of sockpuppetry and will no longer make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia .--Brian Greenwell 16:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Force 101 \|decline=This is not persuasive. Why should we trust you now? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein\|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 20:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|1=I, user of Force101 ,Wish to be unblocked from having been blocked because of sockpuppetry and will no longer make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia .--Brian Greenwell 16:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Force 101 \|decline=This is not persuasive. Why should we trust you now? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein\|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 20:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)}}

			The reason you should trust me now is because i haven't made any unconstructive edits in months!-and i don't plan to any time soon.--Force101 02:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Force101