Jump to content

Forensic science: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Aled D (talk | contribs)
m Removed a link that pointed back to the same page
David3565 (talk | contribs)
m Completed a sentence and added a paragraph conclusion.
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Forensic science''' (often shortened to '''forensics''') is the application of a broad spectrum of [[science|sciences]] to answer questions of interest to the [[legal system]]. This may be in relation to a crime or to a civil action. The use of the term "forensics" in place of "forensic science" could be considered incorrect; the term "forensic" is effectively a synonym for "legal" or "related to courts" (from Latin, it means "before the forum"). However, it is now so closely associated with the scientific field that many dictionaries include the meaning given here.
'''Forensic science''' (often shortened to '''forensics''') is the application of a broad spectrum of [[science|sciences]] to answer questions of interest to the [[legal system]]. This may be in relation to a crime or to a civil action. The use of the term "forensics" in place of "forensic science" could be considered incorrect; the term "forensic" is effectively a synonym for "legal" or "related to courts" (from Latin, it means "before the forum"). However, it is now so closely associated with the scientific field that many dictionaries include the meaning given here.


Criminalistics is the application of various sciences to answer questions relating to examination and comparison of [[forensic genetics|biological evidence]], [[trace evidence]], impression evidence (such as [[fingerprints]], shoeprints, and tire tracks), [[controlled substance|controlled substances]], [[firearm|firearms]], and other evidence in criminal
Criminalistics is the application of various sciences to answer questions relating to examination and comparison of [[forensic genetics|biological evidence]], [[trace evidence]], impression evidence (such as [[fingerprints]], shoeprints, and tire tracks), [[controlled substance|controlled substances]], [[firearm|firearms]], and other evidence in criminal investigations. Some of the forensic science disciplines are:

[[Forensic odontology]] is the study of the uniqueness of dentition.
[[Forensic odontology]] is the study of the uniqueness of dentition.



Revision as of 04:22, 23 January 2006

This article deals with forensic science, used in legal proceedings. For forensic/public speaking, see Debate and Individual events.

Forensic science (often shortened to forensics) is the application of a broad spectrum of sciences to answer questions of interest to the legal system. This may be in relation to a crime or to a civil action. The use of the term "forensics" in place of "forensic science" could be considered incorrect; the term "forensic" is effectively a synonym for "legal" or "related to courts" (from Latin, it means "before the forum"). However, it is now so closely associated with the scientific field that many dictionaries include the meaning given here.

Criminalistics is the application of various sciences to answer questions relating to examination and comparison of biological evidence, trace evidence, impression evidence (such as fingerprints, shoeprints, and tire tracks), controlled substances, firearms, and other evidence in criminal investigations. Some of the forensic science disciplines are:

Forensic odontology is the study of the uniqueness of dentition.

Forensic toxicology is the study of the effect of drugs and poisons on the human body.

Forensic engineering studies the causes of failure of devices and structures.

Forensic accounting is the study and interpretation of accounting evidence.

Forensic psychology and forensic psychiatry deal with the legal aspects of human behavior.

Forensic anthropology is the application of physical anthropology in a legal setting, usually for the recovery and identification of skeltonized human remains.

Forensic entomology deals with the examination of insects in, on, and around human remains to assist in determination of time or location of death.


Forensic history

Aristotle said there are three types of discourse; epideictic (ceremonial speech), deliberative (the type of debate we expect to see in congressional decision making), and forensic (discourse or arguments to be used in the courts). Today the term is often used loosely and many assume that forensics refers to forensic medicine. We use the term forensics to refer to collegiate speech competition. There are many different categories that an individual can compete in. There are limited preparation events (impromptu & extemporaneous speaking), platform events (informative, persuasive & after-dinner speaking), critical events (communication analysis) and interpretive events (prose, poetry, drama, dramatic duo & program oral interpretation).

The "Eureka" legend of Archimedes (287-212 BC) can be considered an early account of the use of forensic science. In this case, by examining the principles of water displacement, Archimedes was able to prove that a crown was not made of gold (as it was fraudulently claimed) by its density and buoyancy.

The earliest account of fingerprint use to establish identity was during the 7th century. According to Soleiman, an Arabic merchant, a debtor's fingerprints were affixed to a bill, which would then be given to the lender. This bill was legally recognized as proof of the validity of the debt.

The first written account of using medicine and entomology to solve (separate) criminal cases is attributed to the book Xi Yuan Ji Lu (洗冤集錄, translated as "Collected Cases of Injustice Rectified"), written in 1248 China by Song Ci (宋慈, 1186-1249). In one of the accounts, the case of a person murdered with a sickle was solved by a death investigator who instructed everyone to bring their sickles to one location. Flies, attracted by the smell of blood, eventually gathered on a single sickle. In light of this, the murderer confessed. The book also offered advice on how to distinguish between a drowning (water in the lungs) and strangulation (broken neck cartilage).

In sixteenth century Europe, medical practitioners in army and university settings began to gather information on cause and manner of death. Ambrose Paré, a French army surgeon, systematically studied the effects of violent death on internal organs. Two Italian surgeons, Fortunato Fidelis and Paolo Zacchia, laid the foundation of modern pathology by studying changes which occurred in the structure of the body as the result of disease. In the late 1700s, writings on these topics began to appear. These included: "A Treatise on Forensic Medicine and Public Health" by the French physician Fodéré, and "The Complete System of Police Medicine" by the German medical expert Johann Peter Franck.

In 1775, Swedish chemist Carl Wilhelm Scheele devised a way of detecting arsenous oxide, simple arsenic, in corpses, although only in large quantities. This investigation was expanded, in 1806, by German chemist Valentin Ross, who learned to detect the poison in the walls of a victim's stomach, and by English chemist James Marsh, who used chemical processes to confirm arsenic as the cause of death in a 1836 murder trial.

Two early examples of English forensic science in individual legal proceedings demonstrate the increasing use of logic and procedure in criminal investigations. In 1784, in Lancaster, England, John Toms was tried and convicted for murdering Edward Culshaw with a pistol. When the dead body of Culshaw was examined, a pistol wad (crushed paper used to secure powder and balls in the muzzle) found in his head wound matched perfectly with a torn newspaper found in Toms' pocket. In Warwick, England, in 1816, a farm laborer was tried and convicted of the murder of a young maidservant. She had been drowned in a shallow pool and bore the marks of violent assault. The police found footprints and an impression from corduroy cloth with a sewn patch in the damp earth near the pool. There were also scattered grains of wheat and chaff. The breeches of a farm laborer who had been threshing wheat nearby were examined and corresponded exactly to the impression in the earth near the pool.

Forensic science in the media

Sherlock Holmes, the fictional character created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in works produced from 1887 to 1915, used forensic science as one of his investigating methods. Conan Doyle credited the inspiration for Holmes on his teacher at the medical school of Edinburgh University, the gifted surgeon and forensic detective Joseph Bell.

Decades later, the comic strip, Dick Tracy also featured a detective using a considerable number of forensic methods, although sometimes the methods were more fanciful than actually possible. The popular television series CSI: Crime Scene Investigation is one of several crime detection series which depict a glamorized version of the activities of 21st Century forensic scientists. It (along with related TV shows) has changed individuals' expectations of forensic science, an influence termed the "CSI effect".

See also

Further reading

  • Baden, Michael, M.D, former New York City Medical Examiner, and Roach, Marion. "Dead Reckoning: The New Science of Catching Killers". Simon & Schuster, 2001. ISBN 0-684-86758-3.
  • Kind, Stuart and Overman, Michael. "Science Against Crime". Doubleday and Company, Inc., New York, 1972. ISBN 0-385-09249-0.
  • Nickell, Joe and Fischer, John F. "Crime Science: Methods of Forensic Detection". University Press of Kentucky, 1999. ISBN 0813120918.
  • Wolfson, Seth, forensic sculptor and make-up FX artist, "Forensic Sculpting: Step-by-Step in Photos." Realsculpt Press, 2005. http://www.forensicsculpting.com/