User talk:207.69.137.6: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:19, 26 May 2010

October 2005

Welcome!

Hello! My name is Eric, and it's my pleasure to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I've noticed you've started making contributions, which is a great thing! On that note, I'd like to invite you to create an account. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

The use of a username of your choice
The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
Your own user page
Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
The ability to rename pages
The ability to upload images
The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
The eligibility to become an administrator
The right to be heard in votes and elections
Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and stay for a long time. No matter whether you choose to create an account or not, I hope you will continue to be a productive (not destructive) member of our community as we strive to make this one of the greatest sites on the world wide web.

EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 00:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

December 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Raelus 20:01, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

January 2006

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — TheKMan^talk 23:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits such as the one you made to Chuck Norris are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. tv316 23:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - cohesion★talk 23:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Parliamentary government, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVD+ R/W 20:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2006

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kusma (討論) 03:46, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

Your recent edit to Yerkes Observatory was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Baron Larf 04:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Arab-Israeli conflict on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Gogo Dodo 21:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

December 2006

Your recent edit to Republic of Texas (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 04:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Johan Andersen. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Danny Lilithborne 22:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Andrei Lomakin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. codetiger 16:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Columbia Torch Lady. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Dcooper 18:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Onorem 13:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Sun Ming Ming. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 18:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from MIMS. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wavemaster447 23:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Jessica, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 23:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Diana, Princess of Wales. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gracenotes^T § 01:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Warcraft universe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Warcraft universe was changed by 207.69.137.6 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-11T18:04:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lake Erie, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mumia-w-18 (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Guess not, i'll call from Hell, I hear it's great this time of year. Later zealot. Atomic Religione (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rockstar Mayhem tour, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rockstar Mayhem tour was changed by 207.69.137.6 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-15T19:38:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Australian Shepherd, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 00:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Tim Duncan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 01:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Tim Duncan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. nneonneo ^talk 01:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Uterus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 07:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cellular respiration, you will be blocked from editing. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Steve Wilkos has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bsadowski1 (talk) 04:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Steve Wilkos constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 04:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Stephen H. Webb has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jake Wartenberg 17:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Kelly Clarkson discography, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 04:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Medina High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Super-Magician ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 00:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Italian Savoyards, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Italian Savoyards was changed by 207.69.137.6 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-10T04:18:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grasshopper, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Grasshopper was changed by 207.69.137.6 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-11-06T03:03:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:American Gold Eagle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

A report about your recent edits has today been made to the above page. Plutonium27 (talk) 14:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 months from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 14:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happened to Vandalising pages

Please Unblock it after the block expires. Please Cirt I Vandalised Pages. I'm sorry, After the block expires. I won't vandalise pages anymore

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

207.69.137.6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

207.69.137.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism

Blocking administrator: Cirt (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Given the long history of vandalism from this ip address, an unblock wouldn't be appropriate. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After the block expires

You mean "After the block expires"

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

207.69.137.6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

207.69.137.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism

Blocking administrator: Cirt (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 23:05, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism won't be anymore

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.69.137.6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Cirt. You have 20 to go. So Please Unblock it then it won't be no more vandalism.

Decline reason:

Not a chance. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 20:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Already readed Guide to appealing block

Yes Cirt. I already readed a Guide to appealing blocks. I was wrong about Vandalism. Don't forget to Unblock it.

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

207.69.137.6 (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

IP address: 207.69.137.6 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: Cirt (talk • blocks)
Block message:

[[WP:Vandalism|Vandalism]]

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=207.69.137.6}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Cirt | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:Vandalism|Vandalism]]</nowiki> | 3=207.69.137.6 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=207.69.137.6 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:Vandalism|Vandalism]]</nowiki> | 3=Cirt | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=207.69.137.6 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:Vandalism|Vandalism]]</nowiki> | 3=Cirt | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

207.69.137.6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@@ Line 148: / Line 148: @@
 {{unblock reviewed|1=Cirt. You have 20 to go. So Please Unblock it then it won't be no more vandalism.|decline=Not a chance. —<font color="228B22">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="00008B"><sup>([[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Dittobori]])</sup></font> 20:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)}}
+== Already readed Guide to appealing block ==
+Yes Cirt. I already readed a Guide to appealing blocks. I was wrong about Vandalism. Don't forget to Unblock it.
+{{unblock-ip|1=207.69.137.6|2=<nowiki>[[WP:Vandalism|Vandalism]]</nowiki>|3=Cirt}}
+{{unblock|your reason here}}