Jump to content

User talk:207.69.137.15: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
The New Section 3: Decline (insufficient rationale)
The New Section 4: new section
Line 48: Line 48:


{{unblock reviewed|1=I Just read a Guide to appealing blocks. So Unblock it and It won't be long term vandal anymore.|decline=Not buying this. Declined. —<font color="228B22">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="00008B"><sup>([[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Dittobori]])</sup></font> 00:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=I Just read a Guide to appealing blocks. So Unblock it and It won't be long term vandal anymore.|decline=Not buying this. Declined. —<font color="228B22">''[[User:Jéské Couriano|Jeremy]]''</font> <font color="00008B"><sup>([[User talk:Jéské Couriano|v^_^v]] [[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Dittobori]])</sup></font> 00:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)}}

== The New Section 4 ==

Nicely, I'm really sorry about the "Long-term Vandal", Please Unblock it. So i won't to be Long-term vandal pages anymore
{{unblock|your reason here}}

Revision as of 21:30, 26 May 2010

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Bob Crosby has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 14:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rising action, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Megaboz (talk) 05:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Iwo Jima. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK004 05:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Tapeworm infection has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Dwarfism, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 05:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page June 29 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Dspradau → talk  21:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your blocking edit pages will be deleted until December 17th, 2009

Your blocking edit pages will be deleted on 12/17/09

Rod Scurry

What specifically on Rod Scurry's article do you feel needs more sources? As far as I am concerned there isn't a single fact in that article that needs more sourcing--Johnny Spasm (talk) 03:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The New Section

Hi Herbert Jason Mitchell. This is 207.69.137.15, Unblock it and i'm sorry about the long-term vandal.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
207.69.137.15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
207.69.137.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

long term vandal


Decline reason: Disruption from this IP has been persistent. Please log in to make edits, as this block is anonymous only. If you do not yet have an account, you can ask for one to be created for you. — Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 04:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The New Section 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.69.137.15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

But I want to edit pages or create account. It's just blocked me for 6 months. And I apologize about the long term vandal. HJ Mitchell. I'm sorry, Please Unblock it

Decline reason:

You can request an account by email, see the box at the top of this page. JohnCD (talk) 07:42, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The New Section 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.69.137.15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I Just read a Guide to appealing blocks. So Unblock it and It won't be long term vandal anymore.

Decline reason:

Not buying this. Declined. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 00:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The New Section 4

Nicely, I'm really sorry about the "Long-term Vandal", Please Unblock it. So i won't to be Long-term vandal pages anymore

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

207.69.137.15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}