Talk:National Federation of the Blind: Difference between revisions
moved tag from article space |
→Is this article written like an advertisement?: new section |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The "See Also" section contains a reference to the "American Foundation for the Blind" which is otherwise unreferenced in the main article. The reference, however, includes the notation "formerly a rival organization controlled by agencies that were against the NFB" which seems entirely out of place and unsubstantiated. If this is to be included I think it needs to be addressed in the main body of the article perhaps in a "Relationships with other Blindness Organizations" section (which might also be a good place for some of the ACB related material) [[User:Bondolo|Bondolo]] 02:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC) |
The "See Also" section contains a reference to the "American Foundation for the Blind" which is otherwise unreferenced in the main article. The reference, however, includes the notation "formerly a rival organization controlled by agencies that were against the NFB" which seems entirely out of place and unsubstantiated. If this is to be included I think it needs to be addressed in the main body of the article perhaps in a "Relationships with other Blindness Organizations" section (which might also be a good place for some of the ACB related material) [[User:Bondolo|Bondolo]] 02:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Is this article written like an advertisement? == |
|||
It doesn't appear so to me. It seems fairly factual and objective in my opinion? [[Special:Contributions/71.77.20.119|71.77.20.119]] ([[User talk:71.77.20.119|talk]]) 00:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:50, 31 May 2010
Template:Spoken Wikipedia In Progress
Response to complete rewrite
I like the old version better than the completely rewritten version of the article. Although it was unreferenced, it was less POV. If no objections, I am reverting it back to the older version and marking it as {{unreferenced}}. Tuxide 20:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I tried to combine the two versions. Academic Challenger 00:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
American Foundation for the Blind notation needs reference
The "See Also" section contains a reference to the "American Foundation for the Blind" which is otherwise unreferenced in the main article. The reference, however, includes the notation "formerly a rival organization controlled by agencies that were against the NFB" which seems entirely out of place and unsubstantiated. If this is to be included I think it needs to be addressed in the main body of the article perhaps in a "Relationships with other Blindness Organizations" section (which might also be a good place for some of the ACB related material) Bondolo 02:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Is this article written like an advertisement?
It doesn't appear so to me. It seems fairly factual and objective in my opinion? 71.77.20.119 (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)