User talk:Uqahr: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:41, 3 June 2010

Please use the "Show preview" button

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding some of your edit(s), in the future, it is recommended that you use the Show Preview button before saving; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. After you are satisfied with all your edits, you can click the save button. Thank you. --Managerarc ^(talk) 19:25, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your your contributions to Pakistan national cricket team, but...

Some of your edits may be unnecessary. I don't want to start an edit war, but I think that in an information box (top right hand side), abbreviations are much better. For example:

First Test match v India at Feroz Shah Kotla, Delhi, 16-18 October 1952

reads better than

First Test match v India at Feroz Shah Kotla, Delhi in India. From 18-16 October 1952

It's all about conciseness and reducing clutter; at least as far as I'm concerned. The corrections you made would be fine in the text body, just kind of pointless in titles and in the info box. If you agree, then I'd appreciate it if you undid your additions, as you know better where they are located. Thanks.

PS: I second the advice given by User talk:Managerarc. Take care, and thanks for using Wikipedia! bigforrap (talk) 16:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in pakistan national cricket team. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Some of your edits can be considered improvements of the writing already on the page, but some are just, lightly put, 'waffle'. I'm not concerned how you spend your time on Wikipedia, edit whatever you wish. But not everything needs editing. Sometimes, being short and concise is better than putting things into long sentences, conveying the same information. By all means work for the greater good, but I would like to discuss this issue with you. Ignoring messages is not the way to go...

Glad to have you here though :)

Hit me back please. bigforrap (talk) 13:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First-Class Cricket

Please read the document under the heading "Classification of Official Cricket" where it is clearly stated that first-class cricket is of three or more days duration: http://icc-cricket.yahoo.net/rules_and_regulations.php Thanks, RossRSmith (talk) 11:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

English

Your English is not good, contrary to what you think YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 04:55, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: What did you say about my English? How dare you?; critising other people; you don't even now what your talking about. Your just jealous and what your saying is racial discrimination. If this happends again, i will report you for bad behviour. Were is your knowledge and proper behaviour. --Uqahr talk 05:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uqahr - whilst Yellow Monkey is perhaps a bit blunt, he has a point. Many of your edits introduce grammatical errors, and your reply to him indicates your poor English - criticising is spelt wrong, you've used now instead of know, your instead of you're (twice), added a d to happens, used a lower case I when it should be upper case and spelt behaviour wrong. Rather than reacting the way you have done, you should use it as an opportunity to improve your English. Andrew nixon (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to argue. All i'm doing is improving the Test cricket article. I don't care what other people say? They are intitled to their own opinion and i have my right to my opinion also. They are just jealous. Thanks!-- Uqahr (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:30, 3 June 2010 edit Andrew nixon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 5,765 edits →English ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:41, 3 June 2010 edit undo Uqahr (talk \| contribs) 359 edits →English: Reply Next edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:

	:::Uqahr - whilst Yellow Monkey is perhaps a bit blunt, he has a point. Many of your edits introduce grammatical errors, and your reply to him indicates your poor English - criticising is spelt wrong, you've used now instead of know, your instead of you're (twice), added a d to happens, used a lower case I when it should be upper case and spelt behaviour wrong. Rather than reacting the way you have done, you should use it as an opportunity to improve your English. [[User:Andrew nixon\|Andrew nixon]] ([[User talk:Andrew nixon\|talk]]) 05:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)		:::Uqahr - whilst Yellow Monkey is perhaps a bit blunt, he has a point. Many of your edits introduce grammatical errors, and your reply to him indicates your poor English - criticising is spelt wrong, you've used now instead of know, your instead of you're (twice), added a d to happens, used a lower case I when it should be upper case and spelt behaviour wrong. Rather than reacting the way you have done, you should use it as an opportunity to improve your English. [[User:Andrew nixon\|Andrew nixon]] ([[User talk:Andrew nixon\|talk]]) 05:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

			::I don't want to argue. All i'm doing is improving the Test cricket article. I don't care what other people say? They are intitled to their own opinion and i have my right to my opinion also. They are just jealous. Thanks!-- [[User:Uqahr\|Uqahr]] ([[User talk:Uqahr\|talk]]) 05:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)