Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungil Hong: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
weak keep
Tyrenius (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:
*'''Pretty weak Keep''' per above - just scrapes through to notability. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 12:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Pretty weak Keep''' per above - just scrapes through to notability. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 12:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep''' per Vejvančický and Johnbod.--[[User:Ethicoaestheticist|Ethicoaestheticist]] ([[User talk:Ethicoaestheticist|talk]]) 21:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep''' per Vejvančický and Johnbod.--[[User:Ethicoaestheticist|Ethicoaestheticist]] ([[User talk:Ethicoaestheticist|talk]]) 21:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per refs given above, but please use them in the article, or at least list them on the article talk page for future use. '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<font color="#880088">Ty</font>]]''''' 23:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:51, 3 June 2010

Jungil Hong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declining speedy as notability is debatable. Elevating for a fuller discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 13:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]