Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KDRGibby/Evidence

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Anomalous_phenomenon&diff=5587219&oldid=5584644] [1].

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.

The Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at /Workshop. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies voting by Arbitrators takes place at /Proposed decision. Only Arbitrators may edit /Proposed decision.

Evidence presented by Rhobite

KDRGibby is uncivil

• Frequently accuses editors of "flawed logic", "poor logic", "poorly reasoned beliefs" etc: [2] [3] [4] [5]
• Petty namecalling: Called User:Electionworld "Electionwood" [6], User:Natalinasmpf "Nataliapumpkin" [7]
• December 4, 2005 - Personal attack: "Electionwood you are an Fing MORON! ... Have you heard of the word IRONIC? Have you heard of the term EMPERICAL EVIDENCE? You are a freaking idiot." [8]
• December 5, 2005 - Personal attack: "Then you insult my position by calling it propaganda, thus showing your lack of intelligence. Again, I hate to call names, and I rarely do it. I only save it for the people who disserve it the most! -Gibby" [9]
• December 11, 2005 - Personal attack: "Natalinasmpf is an immature communist brat from Singapore who keeps deleting this and my other sections from Wiki, she has violated the 3rev policies multiple times and gets away with. Has no logical arguementation skills, and no ability to defend her deltions." [10]
• January 11, 2006 - Personal attack: "I'm repeating again for your thick skull" [11]
• January 12, 2006 - Personal attack: "I hate the goddamn admins on wikipidia they are so fucking stupid!" [12]
• January 12, 2006 - Personal attack: "I'm here to make sure shit is factual and to stop leftist bully vandals like 172, Mattley, Nati, and Babubhatt from destroying factual information that destroys or contradicts their own poorly reasoned beliefs" [13]
• January 12, 2006 - Personal attack: "Calling them stupid leftist fuckers however is a personal attack...as much as I'd like to use that apt term, I have not." [14]
• January 12, 2006 - User:Quadell blocked KDRGibby for a 3RR violation. According to Quadell, KDRGibby responded with "abusive e-mails filled with personal attacks". [15]
• January 16, 2006 - Personal attack: "GIVE SPECIFIC REASONS ASSHOLE!" [16]
• January 18, 2006 - Edit summary: "most admins are socialst sobs" [17]
• January 18, 2006 - Personal attack: "You sound like a nationalist and perhaps a bit of a socialist...thats a national socialist by the way." [18]

KDRGibby revert wars

• Block log: KDRGibby has been blocked four times for 3RR [19]
• First violation December 10, 2005: [20] [21] [22] [23]
• Second violation December 31, 2005: 13:50 14:06 14:10 14:20
• Third violation January 11, 2006: 14:06, January 11, 2006 00:15, January 12, 2006 01:25, January 12, 2006 12:12, January 12, 2006
• Fourth violation January 14, 2006: [24] [25] [26] [27]

KDRGibby maintains a "List of Wiki Bullies"

KDRGibby maintains a "List of Wiki Bullies" at User talk:KDRGibby#List of Wiki Bullies. According to KDRGibby, "Not surprisingly most of these are suspected to be leftists/conservative (aka lovers of big government, socialism, communism, e'tatism, corpratism, tariffs, income taxes, FDR, the NEW DEAL etc etc etc) of some sort, thus they desire to eliminate any points by libertarians (me)or other editors with contradictory views."

KDRGibby vandalizes occasionally

• January 14, 2006 - Vandalized Economics of fascism to make a point. [28]
• December 11, 2005 - Removed large sections of Communism for no good reason. [29] [30] [31]

Evidence presented by {your user name}

First assertion

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion, for example, your first assertion might be "Jimmy Wales engages in edit warring". Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show Jimmy Wales engaging in edit warring

Second assertion

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion, for example, your second assertion might be "Jimmy Wales makes personal attacks". Here you would show specific edits where Jimmy Wales made personal attacks.

Evidence presented by {your user name}

First assertion

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion, for example, your first assertion might be "Jimmy Wales engages in edit warring". Here you would list specific edits to specific articles which show Jimmy Wales engaging in edit warring

Second assertion

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion, for example, your second assertion might be "Jimmy Wales makes personal attacks". Here you would list specific edits where Jimmy Wales made personal attacks.

Evidence presented by {your user name}

First assertion

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion, for example, your first assertion might be "Jimmy Wales engages in edit warring". Here you would list specific edits to specific articles which show Jimmy Wales engaging in edit warring

Second assertion

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion, for example, your second assertion might be "Jimmy Wales makes personal attacks". Here you would list specific edits where Jimmy Wales made personal attacks.