Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davon Washington: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Comment |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* <b>KEEP</b> Notable individual that has been written in several publications in his field including [[Billboard Magazine]] as listed in article references [[WP:RFD#KEEP]]. ([[User:Coogi15|Coogi15]] ([[User talk:Coogi15|talk]]) 04:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC)) |
* <b>KEEP</b> Notable individual that has been written in several publications in his field including [[Billboard Magazine]] as listed in article references [[WP:RFD#KEEP]]. ([[User:Coogi15|Coogi15]] ([[User talk:Coogi15|talk]]) 04:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC)) |
||
:'''Comment''' – Unfortunately, there is no evidence the individual is notable using Wikipedia [[WP:BIO|guidelines]] as a criteria. The references either do not mention the individual or they do not meet the criteria in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I can't tell about the Billboard article because I cannot get a copy of it; regardless, a single article is not "non-trivial" coverage. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 04:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:50, 10 June 2010
- Davon Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 22:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- KEEP Notable individual that has been written in several publications in his field including Billboard Magazine as listed in article references WP:RFD#KEEP. (Coogi15 (talk) 04:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC))
- Comment – Unfortunately, there is no evidence the individual is notable using Wikipedia guidelines as a criteria. The references either do not mention the individual or they do not meet the criteria in reliable sources. I can't tell about the Billboard article because I cannot get a copy of it; regardless, a single article is not "non-trivial" coverage. ttonyb (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)