Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davon Washington: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Coogi15 (talk | contribs)
Comment
Line 9: Line 9:


* <b>KEEP</b> Notable individual that has been written in several publications in his field including [[Billboard Magazine]] as listed in article references [[WP:RFD#KEEP]]. ([[User:Coogi15|Coogi15]] ([[User talk:Coogi15|talk]]) 04:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC))
* <b>KEEP</b> Notable individual that has been written in several publications in his field including [[Billboard Magazine]] as listed in article references [[WP:RFD#KEEP]]. ([[User:Coogi15|Coogi15]] ([[User talk:Coogi15|talk]]) 04:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC))

:'''Comment''' &ndash; Unfortunately, there is no evidence the individual is notable using Wikipedia [[WP:BIO|guidelines]] as a criteria. The references either do not mention the individual or they do not meet the criteria in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I can't tell about the Billboard article because I cannot get a copy of it; regardless, a single article is not "non-trivial" coverage. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 04:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:50, 10 June 2010

Davon Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 22:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Unfortunately, there is no evidence the individual is notable using Wikipedia guidelines as a criteria. The references either do not mention the individual or they do not meet the criteria in reliable sources. I can't tell about the Billboard article because I cannot get a copy of it; regardless, a single article is not "non-trivial" coverage. ttonyb (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]