Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davon Washington: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Comment
Line 11: Line 11:


:'''Comment''' &ndash; Unfortunately, there is no evidence the individual is notable using Wikipedia [[WP:BIO|guidelines]] as a criteria. The references either do not mention the individual or they do not meet the criteria in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I can't tell about the Billboard article because I cannot get a copy of it; regardless, a single article is not "non-trivial" coverage. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 04:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' &ndash; Unfortunately, there is no evidence the individual is notable using Wikipedia [[WP:BIO|guidelines]] as a criteria. The references either do not mention the individual or they do not meet the criteria in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. I can't tell about the Billboard article because I cannot get a copy of it; regardless, a single article is not "non-trivial" coverage. [[User:Ttonyb1|<span style="font-weight:bold; color:blue; text-shadow:grey 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em; letter-spacing: 2px; padding: 1px 3px;"> <i>ttonyb</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ttonyb1#top|talk]]) 04:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' The article reads like a resumé. Basically he was marketing director briefly for Def Jam, and that's it, that's his claim to fame; he's now trolling for business as an independent. No sourcing to indicate notability or verify the claims made. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 01:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:47, 14 June 2010

Davon Washington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 22:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Unfortunately, there is no evidence the individual is notable using Wikipedia guidelines as a criteria. The references either do not mention the individual or they do not meet the criteria in reliable sources. I can't tell about the Billboard article because I cannot get a copy of it; regardless, a single article is not "non-trivial" coverage. ttonyb (talk) 04:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The article reads like a resumé. Basically he was marketing director briefly for Def Jam, and that's it, that's his claim to fame; he's now trolling for business as an independent. No sourcing to indicate notability or verify the claims made. --MelanieN (talk) 01:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]