Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HighKing: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
||
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
||
More fishing - this is vindictiveness, plain and simple. Odd though. This comment, asking LevenBoy [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:British_Isles&diff=prev&oldid=369343585 to explain their relationship with previous sock] of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MidnightBlueMan/Archive MidnightBlueMan and Mister Flash], results in this SPI filing. Distraction tactics perhaps? Odd that LevenBoy restarts editing, on the same "British Isles" articles, practically to the minute of MBM.MF being blocked. --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 13:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
Revision as of 13:25, 21 June 2010
HighKing
HighKing (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HighKing/Archive.
21 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- Popaice (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Insectgirl (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Fionnghlas (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by LevenBoy
This is a relisting of the case [1]. I am asking for a second opinion since it is unclear how the case was concluded. There was an apparent admission of sockpuppetry by HighKing, but no sactions were imposed and account Popaice, which seemed to be acknowledged as a sock, was not even blocked. The account Fionnghlas has been added to this report.
Many of HighKing's edits are concerned with the removal of British Isles, the latest being here. Edit summaries of this class of edits do not normally state that British Isles is being removed. Frequent edit wars have resulted from HighKing's removals and it is possible that alternate accounts and IP editing is, or was, being used to gain an advantage. Behaviourial evidence is strong in the case of all the IPs and the Insectgirl account. Checkuser may assist with Popaice and also with the Fionnghlas account, which appears to have been set up solely to revert edits of User:MidnightBlueMan on a single article [2].
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims. More fishing - this is vindictiveness, plain and simple. Odd though. This comment, asking LevenBoy to explain their relationship with previous sock of MidnightBlueMan and Mister Flash, results in this SPI filing. Distraction tactics perhaps? Odd that LevenBoy restarts editing, on the same "British Isles" articles, practically to the minute of MBM.MF being blocked. --HighKing (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: D + F (3RR using socks and another reason)
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by LevenBoy (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Checkuser may confirm once and for all whether or not sockpuppetry is occurring in this long-running issue, which has already involved the use of socks by opposing editors, and which has spread accross Wikipedia affecting many articles. LevenBoy (talk) 13:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)