Jump to content

User talk:GJGardner: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GJGardner (talk | contribs)
reply
GJGardner (talk | contribs)
typo
Line 7: Line 7:
:: So it has only been a combination of an increase in disruptive behaviour and policy issues with your edits together with reasonable suggestions by other users that you are using at least three other accounts that led me to finally initiate the checkuser which will likely see the current accounts blocked. Future accounts will likely be blocked on sight, as admins can do and always were able to do. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 06:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
:: So it has only been a combination of an increase in disruptive behaviour and policy issues with your edits together with reasonable suggestions by other users that you are using at least three other accounts that led me to finally initiate the checkuser which will likely see the current accounts blocked. Future accounts will likely be blocked on sight, as admins can do and always were able to do. [[User talk:Orderinchaos|Orderinchaos]] 06:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


::: I am only operating one account. I only ever edit with one account. I always have done so. I was blocked from my first account because it was determined that it was a sock of another user, which is still unfair as I had nothing to do with the other (as you yourself at times have pointed out). I try not to be a distuptive editor, I would like to think Im a lot less disruptive than some others that are never disaplined, I am not interested in the behind the scenes work nor the administration of Wiki like yourself. I fail to see the other users suggestions here on Wiki and I thank you for recognising that I am a good contributor to Wikipedia. I can only ask this: What do I have to do to edit Wikipedia again straitaway without having to create an account whenever mine is blocked, for something I had and have no control of anymore. You seem to be over this as much as I am, so I would like to extend a hand to you and the Wikipedia community to sort this out and get on with valuable contributions to Wikipedia. Balls in your court. [[User:GJGardner|GJGardner]] ([[User talk:GJGardner#top|talk]]) 07:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
::: I am only operating one account. I only ever edit with one account. I always have done so. I was blocked from my first account because it was determined that it was a sock of another user, which is still unfair as I had nothing to do with the other (as you yourself at times have pointed out). I try not to be a distuptive editor, I would like to think Im a lot less disruptive than some others that are never disciplined, I am not interested in the behind the scenes work nor the administration of Wiki like yourself. I fail to see the other users suggestions here on Wiki and I thank you for recognising that I am a good contributor to Wikipedia. I can only ask this: What do I have to do to edit Wikipedia again straitaway without having to create an account whenever mine is blocked, for something I had and have no control of anymore. You seem to be over this as much as I am, so I would like to extend a hand to you and the Wikipedia community to sort this out and get on with valuable contributions to Wikipedia. Balls in your court. [[User:GJGardner|GJGardner]] ([[User talk:GJGardner#top|talk]]) 07:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:26, 24 June 2010

Bye.

Lol. You send me a welcome message and then tell me to 'take my crap somewhere else'. So very funny. I guess you are not a very professional member of wiki then. LMAO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.56.86.195 (talk) 12:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, admins don't need the checkuser evidence to block you on this account, as there's ample other evidence. Indeed, that evidence is sufficiently strong that even if the checkuser finds no link, you are still likely to be blocked indef. The reason for my adherence to process, though, is that I actually believe (and have seen in the past) that problematic users can improve over time. This is especially the case with younger users. I have known you were on this account for quite a while, just as I knew from a moderately early stage about Wikistar2, but my (I suppose) conservative-by-Wiki-standards view is that we should only really block for disruption and there has always been productive edits from your accounts. I even advised a fellow admin some time ago not to block you and to see how things played out.
So it has only been a combination of an increase in disruptive behaviour and policy issues with your edits together with reasonable suggestions by other users that you are using at least three other accounts that led me to finally initiate the checkuser which will likely see the current accounts blocked. Future accounts will likely be blocked on sight, as admins can do and always were able to do. Orderinchaos 06:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am only operating one account. I only ever edit with one account. I always have done so. I was blocked from my first account because it was determined that it was a sock of another user, which is still unfair as I had nothing to do with the other (as you yourself at times have pointed out). I try not to be a distuptive editor, I would like to think Im a lot less disruptive than some others that are never disciplined, I am not interested in the behind the scenes work nor the administration of Wiki like yourself. I fail to see the other users suggestions here on Wiki and I thank you for recognising that I am a good contributor to Wikipedia. I can only ask this: What do I have to do to edit Wikipedia again straitaway without having to create an account whenever mine is blocked, for something I had and have no control of anymore. You seem to be over this as much as I am, so I would like to extend a hand to you and the Wikipedia community to sort this out and get on with valuable contributions to Wikipedia. Balls in your court. GJGardner (talk) 07:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]