Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical/Declined/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs)
172,064 edits
→User:Anthonyhcole: reply to Mifter
→User:Anthonyhcole: This is outrageous, this is not what reviewer rights are supposed to be about. It is not intended (we are assured) to be one more weapom for petty little Admins to abuse!
Line 119: Line 119:
::{{notdone}} I'm a little concerned with giving you reviewer rights less than a month after you were blocked for an incident at [[WP:AN/I]]. Is there a specific reason that you'd need the right? I'd be happy to reconsider if you have a need for the right or another admin thinks your trustworthy for it. Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 13:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
::{{notdone}} I'm a little concerned with giving you reviewer rights less than a month after you were blocked for an incident at [[WP:AN/I]]. Is there a specific reason that you'd need the right? I'd be happy to reconsider if you have a need for the right or another admin thinks your trustworthy for it. Best, [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 13:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Mifter, Anthony can be trusted as a reviewer, in my view. The block arose out of a less-than-civil exchange with another user on various talk pages, which led to a series of misunderstandings. It was unconnected to article content. <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 18:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Mifter, Anthony can be trusted as a reviewer, in my view. The block arose out of a less-than-civil exchange with another user on various talk pages, which led to a series of misunderstandings. It was unconnected to article content. <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 18:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
::This is outrageous, this is not what reviewer rights are supposed to be about. It is not intended (we are assured) to be one more weapom for petty little Admins to abuse! <small><span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">[[User:GiacomoReturned|<span style="color:White;background:Blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Giacomo&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 20:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


====[[User:Siddhartha.lahiri]]====
====[[User:Siddhartha.lahiri]]====

Revision as of 20:34, 29 June 2010

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3


User:House1090

I want to help out on whatever possible. I have been here in wikipedia for about 3-4 years, and I often help out when every possible, usually with 3rd Opinions. I thinks time I leave my comfort zone and I begin to help wikipedia in a better way. I want to make the most out of myself. I think this is what I need to make me a better wikipedia patroller. House1090 (talk) 00:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/House1090? -FASTILY (TALK) 00:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
That is my past and I am now ready to move on. Note:That was about two years ago. Thanks, House1090 (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
You have another block in March for violating 1RR on an article. That's fairly recent to be "moving on". ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 02:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Not an admin, but have been reviewing your contributions. I noted you were using multiple signatures in February. While I do not doubt the capacity for change, and you have made positive contributions per your edit history, I still see some issues. You might want to look at User:Jack Merridew, who has made a clean return after a much more contentious sockpuppetry case. N419BH 02:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I think, for now, it would be best to work on making the clean break from your past and showing that you can be productive for an extended period of time. So, for now, no Declined. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 02:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Here Under The Oaks

Interested in being a part of this historic advance. My gnome work might take me to relevant pages soon, to check out this feature. I am versed in the appropriate policies and guidelines. Here Under The Oaks (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
no Declined due to limited edits (66 as of this post) to review. While everything looks good so far, I think it would be good to show how you work through a few more edits. Please continue your good work, however, and you will likely be able to be granted this right after a bit. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 04:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:DJO CODY

I feel like i could better understand things by helping others be safe and to make sure they have up-t date info. DJO CODY (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, not enough experience. Please take a few weeks to learn how the project works and request again at a later date. Nakon 19:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

User:ReneRomann

I'm regularly watching over some articles and also revert vandalism. Some translations from/to de.wp ReneRomann (talk) 09:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
  •  Not done You only have just over a hundred edits and seem to have been almost inactive for some time. Suggest you familiarise yourself with regular editing a little more before rerequesting the new function. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Ltgreenb

I'd like to help protect and review changes on behalf of my firm. Ltgreenb (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done You have only 8 edits and do not meet the requirements. Also, you should not be editing on behalf of your firm. —DoRD (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Danny247

I want to be a reviewer because I love contributing to the community here on Wikipedia and I am great at reviewing. I enjoy making edits and improving articles and the community aswell. Danny247 (talk) 05:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Would like to see a bit more in the way of contributions first. Please continue to edit and apply again in the future. Thanks.  7  09:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Tetevok

I need rights to upload the image for the article, which I'm creating about company "Guramex" Tetevok (talk) 13:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done - will explain how to do that on your talk page.  7  13:21, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Toontown59153

I have been active on WP for a while now. I come here every day to look for edits I can make and I will continue to do so. Toontown59153 (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done You only have 15 edits to English WP, and have not shown that you understand the policy reasons behind the Pending changes trial. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Saju wiki

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Saju wiki (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Admin,
Please provide me edit permission, I understand it's a highly responsible right, I can assure you that I will use this right with care. Recently I read some contents about Zakir Naik which clearly gave a baised comment. He has spoken in multiple occasion on a subject that is not referenced at all in the article I would like to just add them there.
Regards,
Sajan.
 Not done- non-admin, but as this is your first edit you should get a bit more experience around en.wp before requesting this right. Also, you can edit articles without the reviewer permission. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Admin {{not done}} concur. Note that we typically like to see at least 100 edits. —DoRD (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Pongleung

some errors on Nelson Mandela page Pongleung (talk) 04:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear sir/madam,
Hello, this is the first time I write on wikipedia.
I am from Hong Kong.
I would like to make some correction to Nelson Mandela wiki page
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Mandela )and add a link for the song.
Since I am a fans of the band, Beyond, I see that in the music tributes section. The name of the song, Days of Glory should be changed to Glorious days because it is easier for people to search this song on youtube. Also, I am sure it will be better if we place a link to this song. The following is the link.
" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn0ffRDqoUw " . This clip has an English lyric so it will be better for people to understand the song.
Hopefully, you can grant me the right to edit the above information or someone help to make it correct should also be fine.
Thank you very much.
 Not done - the Nelson Mandella page is protected, which requires a different process than the reviewer flag. Will leave you a note on your talk page. The Beyond (band) page can be edited by anyone.  7  06:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


User:Karyasuman

These days, due to 2011 Cricket World Cup approaching and is very near, many unregistered and unknown users vandalise the page and delete many important information. Thus semi protection needed for this article. Thus please allow semi protection for this article. Karyasuman (talk) 01:10, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done This isn't the place to request semi protection- that would be WP:RPP. This page is for requesting the reviewer permission, which has to do with the pending changes trial. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Heymid

Definitely something for me! /HeyMid (contributions) 18:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I believe it would be a grave error to give access to any tools to Heymid, who has been permbanned at Swedish Wikipedia. - Tournesol (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Can you provide some background on the sv.wiki block? Nakon 18:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Tournesol, LISTEN: This is English Wikipedia, and just because I am permanently blocked on Swedish Wikipedia, doesn't mean you should take a sneak peak at my edits. Thanks in advance. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Tournesol is definitely wrong, since I was never given a last chance and never warned before being permanently blocked and has nothing to do with me on English Wikipedia. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I now know you are constantly watching me on English Wikipedia. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:19, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't see where he's wrong, you _are_ indefinitely blocked on sv.wiki. Can you provide some more information on why you were blocked there? Nakon 18:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Of course I can. I know exactly why I got indefinitely blocked from editing on SvWp (Swedish Wikipedia). Simply, the reason was that I stole time from all the other users on SvWp. The reason as to why I haven't gotten a last chance yet, is they forgot the Wikipedia:Forgive and forget rule, which prevented me from moving on from the March and April 2010 incidents. But all this shouldn't threat me from getting a user tool. Also, maybe you are an administrator? I almost at the point where I feel like willing to request a block on Tournesol, since he is hunting me all-around English Wikipedia. That is simply irritating. He has been doing this ever since I got indefinitely blocked from SvWp (which happened on May 29, 2010).
Also, some people have called me a Troll. /HeyMid (contributions) 18:50, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I somehow ended up in the middle of this a couple of weeks ago after Heymid appeared on my talk page out of the blue and asked me to contact an svwiki admin. From what I've seen of a google translated ban discussion on the svwiki equivalent of ANI and from Heymid's contributions here, I think he lacks sufficient judgement to be trusted with the reviewer permission. As to the alleged trolling, I have thus far assumed good faith and advise Heymid in the strongest possible terms to keep his head down- advice which I'll reiterate now. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done, per above. Nakon 21:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

User:FallenAngelsandDemons

I have edited for quite a while. This is an interesting new addition to Wikipedia I would like to explore, and hopefully to be helpful to the cause. FallenAngelsandDemons (talk) 16:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done With <50 edits, I'm afraid you don't yet have the necessary experience to use this tool properly. Consider editing around for a little while, then come back and request the tool again. -FASTILY (TALK) 17:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Huwr

Reason for requesting Reviewer rights huwr (talk) 03:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I've been around for a very long time and I am interested in helping keep Wikipedia speedy and relevant.

 Not done You have made few edits since last year. I'm afraid you do not have enough recent experience to warrant your receipt of this tool. Please consider editing around for awhile before coming back to request the tool. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Can someone explain to me why this is a good reason for declining? Anthony (talk) 00:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Anthonyhcole

I might be able to use it occasionally. Anthony (talk) 07:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done I'm a little concerned with giving you reviewer rights less than a month after you were blocked for an incident at WP:AN/I. Is there a specific reason that you'd need the right? I'd be happy to reconsider if you have a need for the right or another admin thinks your trustworthy for it. Best, Mifter (talk) 13:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Mifter, Anthony can be trusted as a reviewer, in my view. The block arose out of a less-than-civil exchange with another user on various talk pages, which led to a series of misunderstandings. It was unconnected to article content. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 18:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
This is outrageous, this is not what reviewer rights are supposed to be about. It is not intended (we are assured) to be one more weapom for petty little Admins to abuse!  Giacomo  20:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Siddhartha.lahiri

I modify articles frequently. Would like to access Reviewer rights to specifically review Buddhism and Information Technology related articles. SID 08:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done You have less than 70 edits, and I'm not sure if you have enough experience to be trusted with reviewer rights, please re-apply when you have more experience (when you have about 500 or more edits under your belt) and then I or another admin would be happy to grant you the rights once we see you have a good understanding of policy. Best, Mifter (talk) 13:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Pending_changes_reviewer/Historical/Declined/Archive_1&oldid=370848852"