User talk:Nath1991: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:00, 30 June 2010

This user may be busy watching the World Cup in real life. They may not respond swiftly to queries, but will probably get around to doing what you were asking sooner or later.

Archives

  Archives/2009 Archives

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Nath1991! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ávine Júnior Cardoso - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

St Andrew's Cathedral

Hi Nath1991! I am just checking my watched pages and noticed that you reverted a vandalism to St Andrew's Cathedral. I want to alert you to a problem. The unnamed editor who did the vandalising made two separate edits. You reverted only part of the problem and left in place some very misleading information. The problem with this is that when the next editor comes along they think, "good, the vandalism has been fixed" and go away again without checking to see if you have done the job right. Luckily, in this case another editor looked at it and picked up the problem.

A partial correction can mask vandalism, which can then stay in the article for months until a knowledgeable editor finds it. If it's a deletion, or a subtle change like a date it can be hard to detect, except by the person who wrote the article. So it's always best to check on the history page and compare the present state with some reliable previous edit. Amandajm (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hi Nath, please don't restore material removed for copyright reasons without addressing the issue as you did at Big Dee Irwin. That's serously frowned on. Please discuss issues at the article talk page. Thanks. Franamax (talk) 02:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also I notice from the last day of your edits, you've warned the wrong IP editor (which you reverted right away but someone is still going to see a confusing orange bar); a brand new editor created a mainspace page in their first edit then blanked it with the second and you reverted their blanking as vandalism (when IMO it indicates CSD:G7) (and side note, you didn't leave a welcome template on their talk page when you posted there); and as another side note, references to Allah are to the religion of Islam, so it's not "racist" vandalism. It's great that you're helping out with change-patrolling, but please do take a little more care to look into the circumstances of what you're addressing. Thanks for the help though, we need all we can get! Regards. Franamax (talk) 03:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Queensland Derby

I have nominated The Queensland Derby, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queensland Derby. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dancarney (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Eritrea–Ethiopia border skirmish

I have nominated 2010 Eritrea–Ethiopia border skirmish, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Eritrea–Ethiopia border skirmish. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DAI (Δ) 17:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing vandalism

You are doing a nice job undoing vandalism. However, please undo all vandalism and not just one edit. Vandals often create vandalism in several consecutive edits, so you need to check the article's history to ensure that you have caught all the vandalism, such as this vandalism that you missed. Thanks. Gary King (talk) 06:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Colosimo

Hi Nath,

My understanding is as follows. He has been released by Sydney FC (his contract would have expired in the next month or two anyway and since Sydney has no more football until next pre-season he was released to make it easier for him to find a club). The FC Seoul deal fell through (due to a registration deadline being missed due to visa issues) and he is trying to find another short term deal to take him through and stay match fit until the World Cup. Nothing official from Melbourne Heart yet, there was a story saying he had signed but nothing official has come out to confirm that. So it seems he is in limbo as it stands, to the best of my knowledge and the reports he is a free agent currently. Camw (talk) 05:51, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pretty messy situation. I think until something is confirmed that he should be listed as a free agent or unknown - it's better to play it safe and wait for something official than to get it wrong I think. That article on him joining Heart states "Colosimo is believed to have signed", not "has signed" or "has been confirmed to have signed" it's just a (strong) belief. After all, it was believed that he was joining FC Seoul as well... Camw (talk) 06:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Adam_Dickinson.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Adam_Dickinson.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Share your time travel technology with the rest of humanity. 99.231.211.103 (talk) 13:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carry on..jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carry on..jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Motor-Ace-Pieces-464712.JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Motor-Ace-Pieces-464712.JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LogoCliftonHillUnited.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LogoCliftonHillUnited.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please, stop removing valid content from Wikipedia, it is considered vandalism. Straka signed a one-year contract with North Queensland. You can read about this, e.g. here, if you would only be able to read Czech. Regards. - Darwinek (talk) 08:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the article it is written they interviewed Straka, and he confirmed the rumour that he is going to be the coach of North Queensland. He also said he is flying to Australia next week. One way or the other, he will be officially announced as the new coach, sooner or later. - Darwinek (talk) 09:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, mate. No problem. :) I hope he'll have a good time in Australia. He is kind of very popular in the Czech Republic. I am sure, folks will like him in Australia as well. :) - Darwinek (talk) 14:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mendy and Etoile FC

They are not the same player. The one playing for Etoile FC was born in 1988 (http://www.sleague.com/Web/main.aspx?ID=9f67771f-3d3f-498c-9713-d2e5146b1802). Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 13:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sydney fan fest logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sydney fan fest logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hi

G'day, thanks for the feedback. I haven't been doing too much on Wikipedia lately, real life stuff has taken priority, although I do pop on every now and then. I've completely forgotten about the WikiProject idea although would naturally support anyone else who wanted to start it. Cheers for the offer to help, likewise if there's anything I can help you with let me know! Gialloneri (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Football NSW Links

Hi Nath,

Using the straight URL for the footballnsw news articles breaks the links (for example the references section here)

If you are interested, I made a template that makes it a bit easier to link to these articles.

The format is {{FootballNSW|ttnewsid|articlename}}. So using {{FootballNSW|3558|NSW Premier League Round 7 Preview}} results in;

NSW Premier League Round 7 Preview - Football NSW Article.

This works for both stories from the main site, as well as ones on the Premier League site and can be used inside reference brackets in the same format. Let me know if you have any suggested changes or problems. Camw (talk) 03:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tufankaya

Hello Nath, thak you for your help. Actually I am new at Wikipedia and still learning the details. Since you have more experience on this website I want to ask you how I can edit a biased "contribution" that has no relationship with a certain article. On "Mavi Marmara" article some people are making edits that have no relation with the article. The purpose of these edits are to support their biased personal opinions. Everything seem correct on theory, there is an information, there is a source, etc. But the edit have no neutral contribution on the article rater than supporting their cases. An example is as below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=MV_Mavi_Marmara&action=historysubmit&diff=369864531&oldid=369454589

How can I edit such "contributions"?

Thanks in advance

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tufankaya"