User talk:Bongwarrior: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	Archive 1 (April 6, 2007 – October 3, 2007)
	Archive 2 (October 6, 2007 – January 9, 2008)
	Archive 3 (January 10, 2008 – April 18, 2008)
	Archive 4 (April 18, 2008 – September 7, 2008)
	Archive 5 (September 8, 2008 – April 17, 2009)
	Archive 6 (April 18, 2009 – January 27, 2010)
	Archive 7 (January 28, 2010 – present)

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:19, 1 July 2010

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Unsigned messages will likely be removed. For messages left here, I will usually respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I will watch for a response there.
Start a new talk topic.

I almost died laughing

When I saw "Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Truth, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed." I felt disheartened but, I was pleased it was handle in such a proessional manner. Then I saw "Bongwarrior" and oh god I almost died laughing, good job on being the internet police 420xXxBongW4rri0rXxX420 use be kepping us awll safe frum da evil. 04:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)someonenotdumbenoughtobenamedMidnighttoker

You're welcome. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal alert

Sorry to disturb you, but can you block 114.57.231.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). The address is being used by an Indonesian misinformation vandal whose MO is by constantly inserting misinformation into Digimon, movie studio, and American TV station articles and other related articles without a source. His current MO includes connecting Little League with several affiliate Televisa stations. Please act ASAP. Thank you. (I've already tried WP:AIV. But as you see, it's currently backlogged right now.) - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 07:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:23, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gillard

I'm a bit confused by your change in protection. Three IP editors vandalised, and none of it went up. From what I can tell, the pending-changes system was working well. -Rrius (talk) 08:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was working in the sense that it was preventing vandalism from reaching the article. It was failing in the sense that editors still have to revert the vandalism, and there was entirely too much of it going on. Pending changes shouldn't be a replacement for regular protection methods, but it seems to be used that way in a lot of these trials. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rrius, I was the editor who requested protection. Gillard became the PM on June 24. The page became a spam target on June 24. The PC as noted was doing its job, but there was too much of it and thus the need for semi-protection. I felt the request was justified. =)

It'll be cleared in a month and we can return it to PC to see if it's still a spam target, or if it's able to stay on PC for the other month of trial. If we still get spam hits on it, I'm afraid it might need to stay SPed. CycloneGU (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Off on a Tangent

Per my addendum suggestion on the requests page, wherefrom Off On A Tangent and another variation are blocked from creation...it might not hurt to block this variation as well. Right now I can create that one if I wanted to, and someone else may intentionally do so. CycloneGU (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to let this one slide. They haven't tried to use this variation yet, and it's not certain if they ever will. They may have given up, or it simply might not occur to them to try this particular letter combination. Although an article at that exact title was created and eventually deleted, it appears to be completely unrelated to the recent "hip hop sensation/boy band" articles. It's not that I think that protecting the title would be the wrong decision here; it's mostly a matter of opinion. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Hey, I just wanted to let you know those are all proxies. 216.169.96.0/19 and 81.94.192.0/20 will block them. PS: I use robtex to find this out. You can also use this tool to find a better rangeblock. --Bsadowski1 06:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for the tip. I don't usually do range blocks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you block users with "offensive" names when yours is also offensive?

Your name is offensive to me. Perhaps you should be blocked because of it?

No?

Well why do you block others when their names are less offensive than yours? 130.56.93.43 (talk) 11:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, run for adminship, then go ahead and block me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive username

Like the last poster, I also find your name to be offensive, leading to my past vandalism of the page. So if you have a username promoting use of illegal drugs, you should be banned as well. Oh wait, you are an administrator so you can be a hypocrite? You make me sick. Fascist. BenderRobot (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 :By all means, run for adminship, then go ahead and block me. --[[User:Bongwarrior|Bongwarrior]] ([[User talk:Bongwarrior|talk]]) 17:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
+== Offensive username ==
+Like the last poster, I also find your name to be offensive, leading to my past vandalism of the page. So if you have a username promoting use of illegal drugs, you should be banned as well. Oh wait, you are an administrator so you can be a hypocrite? You make me sick. Fascist. [[User:BenderRobot|BenderRobot]] ([[User talk:BenderRobot|talk]]) 22:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC)