Talk:Pilot licensing and certification: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:16, 3 July 2010

Aviation Stub‑class

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This page and others uploaded in the part hour (23 articles) are a reorganization suggested a few weeks ago. See the discussion under the "Pilot licences" page, which became a redirect so you will have to link back to it. David Brooks 07:45, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

For reference,the appropriate discussion is here: Talk:Pilot licences -Lommer | ^talk 00:12, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

TRIVIA

Some early Pilot Licenses were signed by the Wright Brothers. They did not have an expiration or renewal date. They are considered valuable historic documents. Unlike current issue, the FAA may not take these licenses from the owner.

The actual ordinal number for Wilbur and Orville Wright Aero Club of America source found

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_Club_of_America shows 04 for Orville and 05 for Wilbur. But still a citation is needed to confirm.Joefaust (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC) Reference was found. Page 62 of Aero Club of America[reply]

Merge with Private Pilot License

The merge tag has been up for almost a year directing people to this talk page, and there has been no discussion here. I oppose the merge, unless Commercial Pilot License and Airline Transport Pilot License were also merged, and all the information was retained. Even then, I see no particular reason to do that. I will remove the tag in a few weeks if no one comments. 24.20.131.232 (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. Certification by other corporations, sports association, hang glider pilots' clubs, etc. is so starkly different from national certification in some historical and practical scenes. In USA, there is no license for hang glider pilots, although various clubs and associations rate pilots according to different systems for a kind of certification and rating. Joefaust (talk) 02:14, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension/revocation via administrative vs. judiciary action?

Can someone cite the source for this statement near the beginning of the article? Is it true worldwide, or just in certain countries? (I've never heard of this before.) Thank you. Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 16:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Some early Pilot Licenses were signed by the Wright Brothers.  They did not have an expiration or renewal date.  They are considered valuable historic documents.  Unlike current issue, the FAA may not take these licenses from the owner.
-== The actual ordinal number for Wilbur and Orvill need a citation ==
+== The actual ordinal number for Wilbur and Orville Wright Aero Club of America source found ==
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aero_Club_of_America shows 04 for Orville and 05 for Wilbur. But still a citation is needed to confirm.[[User:Joefaust|Joefaust]] ([[User talk:Joefaust|talk]]) 22:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)  Reference was found. Page 62 of [http://books.google.com/books?id=kuYpAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Aero+Club+of+America&source=bl&ots=81i70ZTHO6&sig=XGR-Row-I-gU4WLNlWhA1u8uN28&hl=en&ei=LHAuTPWQCsX_nQec9LXYAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Wright&f=false Aero Club of America]