Talk:Jonathan Fisher (barrister): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:34, 4 July 2010

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

The page is unbiased, informative and verifiable. Hannah.rachel0801 (talk) 13:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The page is about a professional and an academic who has been the subject of secondary source material that is intellectually independent for example see, http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/staff/jonathan-fisher.htm Hannah.rachel0801 (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination for deletion isn not on the grounds that it's an advert although I see that the topic has previously been deleted for that reason, and by your statement (on the article page not her, incidentally) I can only assume you know that also. The ground for deletion is that Jonathan Fisher isn't notable enough to merit inclusion, see WP:BIO. NtheP (talk) 14:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the page 'Jonathan Fisher (lawyer)' and having researched the internet sources listed on the page, it is clear to me that all the information is correct and well substantiated. Consequently, the tags that were applied to the page are no longer applicable and I have removed them. Natural born singer (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Natural Born Singer[reply]

No one has disputed whether the information is correct or not; the main issues are conflict of interest and promotion. There is still some promotional language, and this is still largely a resume style entry. Usually maintenance tags are removed after a rewrite. Hairhorn (talk) 13:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:10, 4 July 2010 edit Natural born singer (talk \| contribs) 13 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:34, 4 July 2010 edit undo Hairhorn (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 40,620 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I have reviewed the page 'Jonathan Fisher (lawyer)' and having researched the internet sources listed on the page, it is clear to me that all the information is correct and well substantiated. Consequently, the tags that were applied to the page are no longer applicable and I have removed them. [[User:Natural born singer\|Natural born singer]] ([[User talk:Natural born singer\|talk]]) 13:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Natural Born Singer		I have reviewed the page 'Jonathan Fisher (lawyer)' and having researched the internet sources listed on the page, it is clear to me that all the information is correct and well substantiated. Consequently, the tags that were applied to the page are no longer applicable and I have removed them. [[User:Natural born singer\|Natural born singer]] ([[User talk:Natural born singer\|talk]]) 13:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Natural Born Singer

			::No one has disputed whether the information is correct or not; the main issues are conflict of interest and promotion. There is still some promotional language, and this is still largely a resume style entry. Usually maintenance tags are removed after a rewrite. [[User:Hairhorn\|Hairhorn]] ([[User talk:Hairhorn\|talk]]) 13:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)