Talk:Eu'Vend: Difference between revisions
23matthias (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
23matthias (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I understood the the old article from February was to much in the tone of a promotional flyer. That's why I tried to merely summarize factual information. That's why I nearly used no adjectives. I agree that there are still some adjectives in the History part. Would the article be fine, if I rewrite this part? [[User:23matthias|23matthias]] ([[User talk:23matthias|talk]]) 13:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC) |
I understood the the old article from February was to much in the tone of a promotional flyer. That's why I tried to merely summarize factual information. That's why I nearly used no adjectives. I agree that there are still some adjectives in the History part. Would the article be fine, if I rewrite this part? [[User:23matthias|23matthias]] ([[User talk:23matthias|talk]]) 13:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
what do you mean by "It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications." The article contains three links to independant newspapers and two to associations |
|||
If I compare the EuVend site with the sites of Electronic Entertainment Expo, Cebit, Frankfurt Motor Show, National Western Stock Show or others I wouldn't say the the EuVend site is writen like a promotional flyer. I believe that the critera for all site should be the some. [[User:23matthias|23matthias]] ([[User talk:23matthias|talk]]) 13:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:54, 15 July 2010
In my point of view the articel is writen neutrally. If you don't agree, please let me know which part isn't neutral.23matthias (talk) 13:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's the overall tone of the article. It's written like a promotional flyer for the event and not an encyclopedia article about it. —C.Fred (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Note for editors: the article in its current text was speedy deleted as spam in February under the title Eu'Vend. —C.Fred (talk) 13:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I understood the the old article from February was to much in the tone of a promotional flyer. That's why I tried to merely summarize factual information. That's why I nearly used no adjectives. I agree that there are still some adjectives in the History part. Would the article be fine, if I rewrite this part? 23matthias (talk) 13:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
what do you mean by "It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications." The article contains three links to independant newspapers and two to associations
If I compare the EuVend site with the sites of Electronic Entertainment Expo, Cebit, Frankfurt Motor Show, National Western Stock Show or others I wouldn't say the the EuVend site is writen like a promotional flyer. I believe that the critera for all site should be the some. 23matthias (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC)