Talk:Her Majesty's Wizard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:42, 15 July 2010

Novels: Fantasy Redirect‑class Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Fantasy task force.

Articles for creation Redirect‑class

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This redirect was accepted on 26 August 2007 by reviewer Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs).

Insanity?

"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters." Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.166.11.82 (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable?

This series is not Harry Potter which spawned movies, but it is a worthy endeavour at fantasy fiction, married with real-world literature and religion. Snowybeagle (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. Snowybeagle (talk) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't deny the article fails to meet the criteria, but instead claim the criteria are at fault? Incredible. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:40, 15 July 2010 edit Snowybeagle (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,088 edits m →Not notable? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:42, 15 July 2010 edit undo 69.181.249.92 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. [[User:Snowybeagle\|Snowybeagle]] ([[User talk:Snowybeagle\|talk]]) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)		:Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. [[User:Snowybeagle\|Snowybeagle]] ([[User talk:Snowybeagle\|talk]]) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

			::So you don't deny the article fails to meet the criteria, but instead claim the criteria are at fault? Incredible. [[Special:Contributions/69.181.249.92\|69.181.249.92]] ([[User talk:69.181.249.92\|talk]]) 14:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)