Talk:NATS Holdings: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→line in introduction reads like advertisement: new section |
m →line in introduction reads like advertisement: sign the comment |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== line in introduction reads like advertisement == |
== line in introduction reads like advertisement == |
||
line "NATS aims to set standards in safety, service and value to their customers – the airlines." reads like an advertisement or directly from nats marketing - doesn't seem to add any value |
line "NATS aims to set standards in safety, service and value to their customers – the airlines." reads like an advertisement or directly from nats marketing - doesn't seem to add any value --[[User:Richlv|Richlv]] ([[User talk:Richlv|talk]]) 02:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:15, 17 July 2010
Aviation Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Advertising?
Links to a not particularly major software supplier added by an employee of that company don't seem relevant. I propose deleting this (or should we add links to all NATS' suppliers?) GTH1 (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Northern Oceanic Transition Area
The operations section should probably also mention NOTA. www.nats.co.uk/8050-9013/IAA-and-NATS-sign-letter-of-intent.html
Md84419 (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
line in introduction reads like advertisement
line "NATS aims to set standards in safety, service and value to their customers – the airlines." reads like an advertisement or directly from nats marketing - doesn't seem to add any value --Richlv (talk) 02:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)