User talk:99.146.0.158: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:17, 18 July 2010

Quackwatch

If you want to remove the link from Clayton College of Natural Health to the "Quackwatch" article, first argue for doing so at Talk:Clayton College of Natural Health and get agreement for it. -- Hoary (talk) 22:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. Quackwatch is widely known to be an irreprutable site by someone "claiming" to be an expert, when in actuality the author never even passed his boards. Learn about the topic more thoroughly before making your edits.

Whatever "irreprutable" might mean, make your case at Talk:Clayton College of Natural Health and get agreement for it. -- Hoary (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Get a dictionary. Like I said - learn something!

Revision as of 22:16, 18 July 2010 edit Hoary (talk \| contribs) Administrators 77,532 edits →Quackwatch: So argue your point. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:17, 18 July 2010 edit undo 99.146.0.158 (talk) →Quackwatch Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Whatever "irreprutable" might mean, make your case at [[Talk:Clayton College of Natural Health]] and get agreement for it. -- [[User:Hoary\|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary\|talk]]) 22:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)		:Whatever "irreprutable" might mean, make your case at [[Talk:Clayton College of Natural Health]] and get agreement for it. -- [[User:Hoary\|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary\|talk]]) 22:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

			Get a dictionary. Like I said - learn something!