Talk:Barred spiral galaxy: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 128.170.62.95 - "" |
→NGC 4565: barred or unbarred galaxy?: new section |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== half or two thirds? == |
== half or two thirds? == |
||
The opening says approximately half of spirals are barred, whereas the first paragraph of the second section claims 2/3s. Those are significantly different values. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/128.170.62.95|128.170.62.95]] ([[User talk:128.170.62.95|talk]]) 16:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The opening says approximately half of spirals are barred, whereas the first paragraph of the second section claims 2/3s. Those are significantly different values. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/128.170.62.95|128.170.62.95]] ([[User talk:128.170.62.95|talk]]) 16:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== NGC 4565: barred or unbarred galaxy? == |
|||
In [[Barred spiral galaxy#The bulges|this article]] written that NGC 4565 is a barred galaxy, but in article [[NGC 4565]] - it is an unbarred galaxy. Where properly? [[User:Andrew M. Vachin|Andrew M. Vachin]] ([[User talk:Andrew M. Vachin|talk]]) 09:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:34, 19 July 2010
A summary of this article appears in Galaxy. |
Astronomy C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
question
How do you create external links on wiki? Do you just insert the "a href" html code you do for usual webpages?
- Like this: [http://www.webpage.com/ TitleofWebpage]. And by the way, the Milky Way has long been suspected to be barred. Spitzer is just the most recent confirmation. :) --Etacar11 00:26, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. Yeah, it has been suspected to be a barred spiral, but the Spitzer has pretty much just proved it. And the bar is alot longer than previously thought. :) OK, testing link here (it did ask for sources, after all)... Title.
- Your edit to the article makes it sound like yesterday astronomers thought it was a regular spiral and today they think its barred. That's all I meant. :) --Etacar11 03:10, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Just made a quick update, sounds a little more appropriate now.
Slashdot linkage
Heads up, there is a front page link to this article on slashdot right now, so expect edit traffic and vandalism to spike. - Chairboy 16:51, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Yikes, and it's such a tiny article in need of expansion! --Etacar11 16:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Typos
Arn't Sm's spiral galaxies wit a bit of irregularities, not dwarfs. The classification for dwarf galaxies are with a "d" before it. So the LMC and SMC should be classified as dSBm. But isn't that funny, two barred galaxies orbiting a barred galaxy, LOL.
— Hurricane Devon ( Talk ) 22:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Generalization from a single example?
This sentence from the page: "Studying the core of the Milky Way, scientists found out that the Milky Way's bulge was peanut-shaped. This led to the conclusion that all barred spiral galaxies have a peanut shaped bulge." should be rewritten with more examples and a better explanation of the scientific process that was used. Otherwise, one might think that a generalization was made from ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE. Hugo Dufort 04:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Bulge
I'm just curious but would a centralized black hole or object with a high mass account for the bulge, since it seems like stars around a central black hole orbit in that sort of fashion (varying directions) which would attribute to the "Bulge" Marx01 Tell me about it 00:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
half or two thirds?
The opening says approximately half of spirals are barred, whereas the first paragraph of the second section claims 2/3s. Those are significantly different values. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.170.62.95 (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
NGC 4565: barred or unbarred galaxy?
In this article written that NGC 4565 is a barred galaxy, but in article NGC 4565 - it is an unbarred galaxy. Where properly? Andrew M. Vachin (talk) 09:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)