Talk:Linear canonical transformation: Difference between revisions
m set valid class in maths template |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
: Correct. The x should be the k defined in the previous section. I have corrected this - [[User:jhealy|jhealy]] 14:05 (GMT), May 20, 2009 |
: Correct. The x should be the k defined in the previous section. I have corrected this - [[User:jhealy|jhealy]] 14:05 (GMT), May 20, 2009 |
||
---- |
|||
I have two issues with the article as is, both related to the equation |
|||
:{| border="0" |
|||
|- |
|||
| <math>X_{(a,b,c,d)}(u) = \sqrt{-i} \cdot e^{-i \pi \frac{d}{b} u^{2}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i 2 \pi \frac{1}{b} ut}e^{i \pi \frac{a}{b} t^2} x(t) \; dt \, , </math> {{pad|3em}} || when ''b'' ≠ 0, |
|||
|- |
|||
| <math>X_{(a,0,c,d)}(u) = \sqrt{d} \cdot e^{-i \pi cdu^{2}} x(du) \, ,</math> || when ''b'' = 0. |
|||
|} |
|||
First, when I do a search of articles on the LCT, most use a kernel that does not have the factor of <math>2\pi</math> that occurs in the kernel here. This difference is a bit like the choice of kernel for the Fourier transform, where some authors put the <math>2\pi</math> in the exponent of the kernel, and some put it as a constant outside the exponential. (For my purposes, the form here is better! But the majority of the literature seems to have the other form.) |
|||
Second, I think that there is a factor of <math>1/\sqrt{b}</math> missing from the kernel. It should be |
|||
:{| border="0" |
|||
|- |
|||
| <math>X_{(a,b,c,d)}(u) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{ib}} \cdot e^{-i \pi \frac{d}{b} u^{2}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i 2 \pi \frac{1}{b} ut}e^{i \pi \frac{a}{b} t^2} x(t) \; dt \, , </math> {{pad|3em}} || when ''b'' ≠ 0, |
|||
|} |
|||
If anyone is following this page, please check that this is correct --- I'm reluctant to make a change without confirmation. [[User:PiperArrow123|PiperArrow123]] July 19, 2010 |
Revision as of 18:47, 19 July 2010
Mathematics B‑class Mid‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Physics C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
I have corrected two simple details:
Use of i = sqrt(-1) is better than 'j'. i is used in Mathematics instead of j In matrix for fourier transform the minus sign was wrong in the upper value -1. It's 1.
- In the applications section there are so many i's already, and the figures use i as subscripts, so that they should be redone without the i. Without changing figure j is better. In any event, or must appear in the text. Either i or j is acceptable, but they must be defined in the text.--Rmoba (talk) 20:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
user cems2 says: I beleive the formula used for the spherical lens is wrong. specifically the x in the exponent numerator I think should be a constant, probably unity. as it stands the formula is not symmetric in x and y. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.12.184.2 (talk) 22:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Correct. The x should be the k defined in the previous section. I have corrected this - jhealy 14:05 (GMT), May 20, 2009
I have two issues with the article as is, both related to the equation
when b ≠ 0, when b = 0.
First, when I do a search of articles on the LCT, most use a kernel that does not have the factor of that occurs in the kernel here. This difference is a bit like the choice of kernel for the Fourier transform, where some authors put the in the exponent of the kernel, and some put it as a constant outside the exponential. (For my purposes, the form here is better! But the majority of the literature seems to have the other form.)
Second, I think that there is a factor of missing from the kernel. It should be
when b ≠ 0,
If anyone is following this page, please check that this is correct --- I'm reluctant to make a change without confirmation. PiperArrow123 July 19, 2010