Converse relation: Difference between revisions
Add reference and establish Harvard style inline references |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[mathematics]], the '''inverse relation''' of a [[binary relation]] is the relation that occurs when you switch the order of the elements in the relation. For example, the inverse of the relation 'child of' is the relation 'parent of'. In formal terms, if <math>L \subseteq X \times Y</math> is a relation |
In [[mathematics]], the '''inverse relation''' of a [[binary relation]] is the relation that occurs when you switch the order of the elements in the relation. Many functions do not have an inverse; every relation does. For example, the inverse of the relation 'child of' is the relation 'parent of'. In formal terms, if <math>L \subseteq X \times Y</math> is a relation |
||
from ''X'' to ''Y'' then <math>L^{-1}</math> is the relation defined so that <math>y\,L^{-1}\,x</math> if and only if <math>x\,L\,y</math> (Halmos 1975, p. 40). |
from ''X'' to ''Y'' then <math>L^{-1}</math> is the relation defined so that <math>y\,L^{-1}\,x</math> if and only if <math>x\,L\,y</math> (Halmos 1975, p. 40). |
||
Revision as of 17:38, 22 July 2010
In mathematics, the inverse relation of a binary relation is the relation that occurs when you switch the order of the elements in the relation. Many functions do not have an inverse; every relation does. For example, the inverse of the relation 'child of' is the relation 'parent of'. In formal terms, if is a relation from X to Y then is the relation defined so that if and only if (Halmos 1975, p. 40).
The notation comes by analogy with that for an inverse function.
The inverse relation is also called the converse relation or transpose relation (in view of its similarity with the transpose of a matrix: these are the most familiar examples of dagger categories), and may be written as LC, LT, L~ or .
Note that, despite the notation, the converse relation is not an inverse in the sense of composition of relations: in general.
Properties
A relation equal to its inverse is a symmetric relation (in the language of dagger categories, it is self-adjoint).
If a relation is reflexive, irreflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, asymmetric, transitive, total, {{#invoke:Binary_relation|Relations_over_a_set|trichotomous}}, a partial order, total order, strict weak order, {{#invoke:Strict_weak_order|Total_preorders|total preorder}} (weak order), or an equivalence relation, its inverse is too.
However, if a relation is {{#invoke:Binary_relation|Relations_over_a_set|extendable}}, this need not be the case for the inverse.
The operation of taking a relation to its inverse gives the category of relations Rel the structure of a dagger category.
The the set of all binary relations B(X) on a set X is a semigroup with involution with the involution being the mapping of a relation to its inverse relation.
Examples
For usual (maybe strict or partial) order relations, the converse is the naively expected "opposite" order, e.g. , etc. (Parentheses would not be needed here but have been added for clarity.)
Inverse relation of a function
A function is invertible if and only if its inverse relation is a function, in which case the inverse relation is the inverse function.
The inverse relation of a function is the relation defined by .
This is not necessarily a function: One necessary condition is that f be injective, since else is multi-valued. This condition is sufficient for being a partial function, and it is clear that then is a (total) function if and only if f is surjective. In that case, i.e. if f is bijective, may be called the inverse function of f.