Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Company of Death: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:25, 5 August 2010

Company of Death

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have check on Google for search results for the article, all it turns to be a catering company based in Manhattan, New York City, New York. I suspect that the article may be a hoax. I suggest this article should be deleted because of that. Also, Cunibertus should be blocked for disruptive editing. --JJ98 (talk) 01:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

user Jj98 should be blocked because he is incompetent and consequently unapt to do anything useful on wikipedia or an hoax himself, if he would be somehow limitedly competent he should have looked for medieval historical matters or also for classical theater operas as I would suggest him http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_battaglia_di_Legnano facebook would be also a useful source for him, considering his cultural limits http://www.facebook.com/photo_search.php?oid=49135283761&view=all if mr JJ98 had any interest in military history I would also suggest him http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/battleswars10011200/p/legnano.htm http://burnpit.legion.org/2010/05/battle-of-legnano-italians-defeat-frederick-barbarossa%E2%80%99s-germans/ but the links to the related articles of the battle of Legnano and Alberto da Giussano are also clearly present on the page of the article I would also ask why people whose specific interests, and I would hope competence, is in totally different areas of expertise, as for Mr JJ98 in tv soap operas or another one in eastern european matters, would say anything in areas where the same individual hasn't clearly any notion about as is the medieval history of Italy frankly the absurd number of incompetent individuals I have to increasingly suffer on wikipedia is quietly annoing and a bigger minus for the whole project itself Cunibertus (talk) 01:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as hoax. Supposed founder Alberto da Giussano is probably fiction, as says article about him and fictional person cannot establish company. If it not hoax, this Company lacks notability. --Yopie (talk) 07:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —Yopie (talk) 07:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know many historical persons are considered legendary including William Tell, Zoroaster and Bogomil ? According with your no-logic you should propose also the delation of every article related to Switzerland as it has never been created as its legendary founder is a fictionous personage evidently someone ignores that in pre-modern times the use of a collective pseudonym was quietly common to designate the related realizations of a group of individuals, evidently someone never read the jewish or the christian Bible (forex http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Isaiah#Authorship) and for a better research about the Company of Death, which is simply a spinoff of the article of the Battle of Legnano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

about the relevance of the Company of Death, it is related to the main article to which it is linked, The Battle of Legnano http://www.servinghistory.com/topics/Battle_of_Legnano and of course to the Barbarossa, the History of the Holy Roman Empire In the long term the decline of imperial power would divide Germany until the 19th century. the Investiture Controversy The dispute did not end with the Concordat of Worms. There would be future disputes between popes and Holy Roman Emperors, until northern Italy was lost to the Empire entirely. The Church would turn the weapon of Crusade against the Holy Roman Empire under Frederick II. According to Norman Cantor: The investiture controversy had shattered the early-medieval equilibrium and ended the interpenetration of ecclesia and mundus. Medieval kingship, which had been largely the creation of ecclesiastical ideals and personnel, was forced to develop new institutions and sanctions. The result during the late eleventh and early twelfth centuries, was the first instance of a secular bureaucratic state whose essential components appeared in the Anglo-Norman monarchy."[14] Once again I have to complain about the interference on wiki of poorly competent individuals in matters they haven't any notion about Cunibertus (talk) 09:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 about the relevance of the Company of Death, it is related to the main article to which it is linked, The [[Battle of Legnano]]
 http://www.servinghistory.com/topics/Battle_of_Legnano
- and of course to the [[Barbarossa]], the [[History of the Holy Roman Empire]]
+and of course to the [[Barbarossa]], the [[History of the Holy Roman Empire]]
 In the long term the decline of imperial power would divide Germany until the 19th century.
 the [[Investiture Controversy]]