Jump to content

Real estate trends: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Real estate trends''' is a generic [[term]] used to describe any consistent pattern or change in the general direction of the [[real estate]] industry which, over the course of time, causes a statistically noticeable change. This phenomenon can be a result of the economy, a change in [[Mortgage loan|mortgage]] rates, consumer speculations, or other fundamental and non-fundamental reasons.
'''Real estate trends''' is a generic [[term]] used to describe any consistent pattern or change in the general direction of the [[real estate]] industry which, over the course of time, causes a statistically noticeable change. This phenomenon can be a result of the economy, a change in [[Mortgage loan|mortgage]] rates, consumer speculations, or other fundamental and non-fundamental reasons.


== Buyer agency growth ==
== Buyer agency growth ==
At one time, all [[real estate broker]]s and agents, or [[realtors]], practiced "single agency", meaning they represented only the buyer or only the seller<ref>Wikipedia Articles</ref>. A study by [[Consumer Reports|Consumer Reports Magazine]], published in [http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/money/real-estate/real-estate/what-the-survey-found/real-estate-what-the-survey-found.htm September 2008 Issue], indicates that a Realtor was presumed by state law to be working for the seller if not specifically retained to work for the buyer. In the 1990s, the concept of [[buyer agent|buyer agency]] became popular<ref>Wikipedia Article - [[Real_estate_broker/agent]]</ref>. Under buyer agency, a buyer may retain their own agent, which establishes buyer agency, which obligates the real estate agent to represent the best interests of the buyer at all times. Agents were <ref>[http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/money/real-estate/real-estate/what-the-survey-found/real-estate-what-the-survey-found.htm presumed by law]</ref> to be working for the seller's best interest. The Magazine also noted in the same article that buyers who had buyer agents paid an average of $5000 less than unrepresented buyers.<ref>Consumer Reports Magazine, September 2008</ref> An unrepresented real estate buyer can still call the sellers agent to arrange a showing of the property. In such cases, the buyer should be advised by Agency Disclosure Laws (a state law in the U.S.) that any information obtained, as well as all conversations and negotiations undertaken, will be for the benefit of the seller.{{cn|date=August 2010}}
At one time, all [[real estate broker]]s and agents, or [[realtors]], practiced "single agency", meaning they represented only the buyer or only the seller<ref>Wikipedia Articles</ref>. In the 1990s, the concept of [[buyer agent|buyer agency]] became popular<ref>Wikipedia Article - [[Real_estate_broker/agent]]</ref>. A study by [[Consumer Reports|Consumer Reports Magazine]], published in [http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/money/real-estate/real-estate/what-the-survey-found/real-estate-what-the-survey-found.htm September 2008 Issue], indicates that prior to this development, a Realtor was presumed by state law to be working for the seller. The article explains that a buyer may retain their own agent, which establishes buyer agency, which obligates the real estate agent to represent the best interests of the buyer at all times. This results in a savings of $5000 for buyers compared to prices paid by unrepresented buyers. for the average buyer who had a buyer agent. s paid an average of $5000 less than unrepresented buyers.<ref>Consumer Reports Magazine, September 2008</ref> An unrepresented real estate buyer can still call the sellers agent to arrange a showing of the property. In such cases, the buyer should be advised by Agency Disclosure Laws (a state law in the U.S.) that any information obtained, as well as all conversations and negotiations undertaken, will be for the benefit of the seller.{{cn|date=August 2010}}


== Lower commission rates ==
== Lower commission rates ==

Revision as of 18:13, 6 August 2010

Real estate trends is a generic term used to describe any consistent pattern or change in the general direction of the real estate industry which, over the course of time, causes a statistically noticeable change. This phenomenon can be a result of the economy, a change in mortgage rates, consumer speculations, or other fundamental and non-fundamental reasons.

Buyer agency growth

At one time, all real estate brokers and agents, or realtors, practiced "single agency", meaning they represented only the buyer or only the seller[1]. In the 1990s, the concept of buyer agency became popular[2]. A study by Consumer Reports Magazine, published in September 2008 Issue, indicates that prior to this development, a Realtor was presumed by state law to be working for the seller. The article explains that a buyer may retain their own agent, which establishes buyer agency, which obligates the real estate agent to represent the best interests of the buyer at all times. This results in a savings of $5000 for buyers compared to prices paid by unrepresented buyers. for the average buyer who had a buyer agent. s paid an average of $5000 less than unrepresented buyers.[3] An unrepresented real estate buyer can still call the sellers agent to arrange a showing of the property. In such cases, the buyer should be advised by Agency Disclosure Laws (a state law in the U.S.) that any information obtained, as well as all conversations and negotiations undertaken, will be for the benefit of the seller.[citation needed]

Lower commission rates

Competitive pressure resulting from a record number of licensed agents has driven down the average sales commission rates paid by sellers.[citation needed] The historical average for a full service brokerage was seven percent.[citation needed] The current average is reported[by whom?] to be roughly five percent (slightly higher or lower in some markets).[4]

Agent/brokers relationships

Traditional real estate brokerages "split" commission with agents. Historically, most brokerages paid 50 percent commission to agents, and retained 50 percent for brokerage operation costs such as facilities, utilities, clerical staff, office machinery, yard signs and marketing.[citation needed] This arrangement was known as a 50/50 split. Under this arrangement, the brokerage paid almost all of the agent's costs. More successful agents might negotiate a higher percentage of the commission. With the introduction of the 100 percent commission plan models popularized by RE/MAX and Keller Williams Brokerages, other companies were forced to raise their commission splits to as high as 70/30 or even 90/10 or 100 percent.[citation needed] The first number represents the percent of commission retained by the agent. With high agent splits came a shifting of costs from brokerage to agent. Agents on higher splits tend to work from home or pay desk fees (monthly fees for the use of office space). Under these arrangements, agents often pay for their own phone and fax lines, office furniture, clerical assistance, signs, and advertising.[citation needed]

Buyers used to drive neighborhoods and call agents when they found a house they want to see. Newspaper ads were a very large part of the marketing of a home for sale. Most ads were paid for by the real estate broker or agent who listed the property.[citation needed] The broker or agent would recoup expenses only if and when the house sold. Since the 1990s, buyers have relied more and more on Internet marketing, and less on print advertising.[citation needed] It is estimated that as many as 80 percent of buyers use the Internet to identify and screen homes during their search.[citation needed]

U.S. government involvement

The United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division announced the launch of a new website in October 2007 to "educate consumers and policymakers about the potential benefits that competition can bring to consumers of real estate brokerage services and the barriers that inhibit that competition."[citation needed] Among other findings, they report that certain new sales models can reduce consumer home sales costs "by thousands of dollars. For example, in states that allow open competition, some buyer's brokers rebate up to two-thirds of their commission to the customer, and some seller's brokers offer limited-service packages that let sellers list their homes on the local Multiple Listing Service (MLS) for as little as a few hundred dollars."[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ Wikipedia Articles
  2. ^ Wikipedia Article - Real_estate_broker/agent
  3. ^ Consumer Reports Magazine, September 2008
  4. ^ CBS News: 60 Minutes
  5. ^ "Antitrust division launches website on competition in the real estate brokerage industry". Retrieved 2007-10-17.