Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahdyar Aghajani: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Delete''' Fails WP:ENT and WP:MUSIC.[[User:Farhikht|Farhikht]] ([[User talk:Farhikht|talk]]) 15:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Fails WP:ENT and WP:MUSIC.[[User:Farhikht|Farhikht]] ([[User talk:Farhikht|talk]]) 15:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' if G hits are good only when you mix his name with others so the article is not idependently notable, also I dont think the references of the article can pass [[WP:RS]]. [[User:Spada2|Spada II ♪♫]] ([[User talk:Spada2|talk]]) 06:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' if G hits are good only when you mix his name with others so the article is not idependently notable, also I dont think the references of the article can pass [[WP:RS]]. [[User:Spada2|Spada II ♪♫]] ([[User talk:Spada2|talk]]) 06:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' Given a work that was directly behind a successful album which sources recognise as notable, the composer of such work becomes notable as the creator of a notable work even so composer hasn't been mentioned rigorously. Hint hint, sockpuppeting is not to be tolerated. --[[User:Halaghate.sabz|Halaghate.sabz]] ([[User talk:Halaghate.sabz|talk]]) 17:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:22, 7 August 2010
- Mahdyar Aghajani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable musician. Seems self-written and all of the sources of the page is slef-published or unreliable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rapefarsiforlife (talk • contribs) 2010/08/02 21:25:54 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and also google hits are low quality. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 09:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Google hits become high quality once mixing his acronym with the rapper who he works for. Section 2 of WP:MUSIC 'Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.' The album 'Jangal-e Asfalt', was a multi-million selling album. --Halaghate.sabz (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ENT and WP:MUSIC.Farhikht (talk) 15:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment if G hits are good only when you mix his name with others so the article is not idependently notable, also I dont think the references of the article can pass WP:RS. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 06:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Given a work that was directly behind a successful album which sources recognise as notable, the composer of such work becomes notable as the creator of a notable work even so composer hasn't been mentioned rigorously. Hint hint, sockpuppeting is not to be tolerated. --Halaghate.sabz (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)