User talk:Atchucan: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m →Multiplayer online battle arena: restored missing quotation mark |
m →Multiplayer online battle arena: fixed link |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:DotA based games would be more appropriate. |
:DotA based games would be more appropriate. |
||
:preceding unsigned comment by [[User:Atchucan|Atchucan]] <sup>([[User Talk:Atchucan|talk)</sup> at 07:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC). |
:preceding unsigned comment by [[User:Atchucan|Atchucan]] <sup>([[User Talk:Atchucan|talk]])</sup> at 07:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC). |
||
::So we should all call [[Real-time strategy]] games "Dune-based games" and [[MMORPG]]s "Ultima-Online-based games". Right. |
::So we should all call [[Real-time strategy]] games "Dune-based games" and [[MMORPG]]s "Ultima-Online-based games". Right. |
Revision as of 14:50, 9 August 2010
Welcome
|
Your arguments are losing credibility as you place increasingly nonsensical deletion tags on the titular page. As you could not gain consensus, please leave it be. ~rezecib (talk) 18:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Quoting Rwiggum:
- Refer here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Moba_Genre
- "The genre itself has merits, but the name itself (Multiplayer Online Battle Arena) is a neologism."
- DotA based games would be more appropriate.
- preceding unsigned comment by Atchucan (talk) at 07:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC).
- So we should all call Real-time strategy games "Dune-based games" and MMORPGs "Ultima-Online-based games". Right.
- The same person in that discussion writes "the genre itself is not yet notable enough for inclusion" -- but that was more than a year ago, during which time the genre has developed significantly. It is now notable.