Jump to content

Talk:Robert Shimer: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 18: Line 18:
{{Notabilityguide}}
{{Notabilityguide}}


:I just linked to the Faculty list at the University of Chicago, and the Editorial Board list at the ''Journal of Political Economy'', as secondary sources to verify his positions. But hold on a minute... Shimer's articles and publications are not just blog posts. They are ''peer reviewed'' publications of the highest quality. His most famous paper (the one I cited) is published in ''American Economic Review'', usually considered the most prestigious economics journal. He is a member of one of the top five (roughly) economics departments, he edits one of the top five (roughly) economics journals, and he was invited to summarize his research contributions for the NBER (not everyone gets that opportunity). These are all signs of his notability within the economics field. His notability is typical for economists who are listed in Wikipedia (see [[List of economists]]). However, unlike many on the [[List of economists]], he is young, and his impact on economic research is being felt ''now''. I've now found another paper, by G. Cardullo, that discusses the impact of Shimer's work. But the conundrum of covering currently-important researcher like Shimer is that most of the writing that proves his influence is by him, not yet about him.[[User:Rinconsoleao|Rinconsoleao]] ([[User talk:Rinconsoleao|talk]]) 09:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
:I just linked to the Faculty list at the University of Chicago, and the Editorial Board list at the ''Journal of Political Economy'', as secondary sources to verify his positions. But hold on a minute... Shimer's articles and publications are not just blog posts. They are ''peer reviewed'' publications of the highest quality. His most famous paper (the one I cited) is published in ''American Economic Review'', usually considered the most prestigious economics journal. He is a member of one of the top five (roughly) economics departments, he edits one of the top five (roughly) economics journals, and he was invited to summarize his research contributions for the NBER (not everyone gets that opportunity). These are all signs of his notability within the economics field. His notability is typical for economists who are listed in Wikipedia (see [[List of economists]]). However, unlike many on the [[List of economists]], he is young, and his impact on economic research is being felt ''now''. I've now found another paper, by G. Cardullo, that discusses the impact of Shimer's work. But the conundrum of covering a currently-important researcher like Shimer is that most of the writing that proves his influence is by him, not yet about him.[[User:Rinconsoleao|Rinconsoleao]] ([[User talk:Rinconsoleao|talk]]) 09:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:23, 11 August 2010

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconEconomics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.


No secondary sources are cited

The only references are this man's web site and articles he wrote.

There are no independent sources referred to in the article.

The guideline page -- WP:Notability -- states:

I just linked to the Faculty list at the University of Chicago, and the Editorial Board list at the Journal of Political Economy, as secondary sources to verify his positions. But hold on a minute... Shimer's articles and publications are not just blog posts. They are peer reviewed publications of the highest quality. His most famous paper (the one I cited) is published in American Economic Review, usually considered the most prestigious economics journal. He is a member of one of the top five (roughly) economics departments, he edits one of the top five (roughly) economics journals, and he was invited to summarize his research contributions for the NBER (not everyone gets that opportunity). These are all signs of his notability within the economics field. His notability is typical for economists who are listed in Wikipedia (see List of economists). However, unlike many on the List of economists, he is young, and his impact on economic research is being felt now. I've now found another paper, by G. Cardullo, that discusses the impact of Shimer's work. But the conundrum of covering a currently-important researcher like Shimer is that most of the writing that proves his influence is by him, not yet about him.Rinconsoleao (talk) 09:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]