Critique: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Plasticdoor (talk | contribs) Basic definition of process of critique and why critique is not criticism. |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Citations missing|date=May 2008}} |
{{Citations missing|date=May 2008}} |
||
Critique is the disciplined, systematic analysis of a written or oral discourse. Critique differs from (is not) criticism in that critique is never personalized nor ad hominem, but is the analyses of the structure of the thought in the content of the item critiqued, and which then offers either a rebuttal or a suggestion of further expansion of the problems presented by the topic that specific written or oral argumentation. The term '''critique''' derives from the Greek term ''kritikē'' (κριτική), meaning "(the art of) discerning", that is, discerning the value of persons or things. Critique is an accepted and established process of scholarly debate. In the fine arts and the humanities, and especially in writing, critique is influenced by the scientific method of analysis. |
|||
⚫ | |||
== Philosophy == |
|||
⚫ | In [[philosophy|philosophical]] contexts it is influenced by [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]]'s use of the term to mean a reflective examination of the validity and limits of a human capacity or of a set of philosophical claims and has been extended in modern philosophy to mean a systematic inquiry into the conditions and consequences of a [[concept]], [[theory]], [[discipline]], or approach and an attempt to understand its limitations and validity. A ''critical'' perspective, in this sense, is the opposite of a ''[[dogma]]tic'' one. Kant wrote: |
||
: We deal with a concept dogmatically ... if we consider it as contained under another concept of the object which constitutes a principle of reason and determine it in conformity with this. But we deal with it merely critically if we consider it only in reference to our cognitive faculties and consequently to the subjective conditions of thinking it, without undertaking to decide anything about its object<ref>Emmanuel Kant, ''[[Critique of Judgment]]'' section 74.</ref>. |
: We deal with a concept dogmatically ... if we consider it as contained under another concept of the object which constitutes a principle of reason and determine it in conformity with this. But we deal with it merely critically if we consider it only in reference to our cognitive faculties and consequently to the subjective conditions of thinking it, without undertaking to decide anything about its object<ref>Emmanuel Kant, ''[[Critique of Judgment]]'' section 74.</ref>. |
Revision as of 15:30, 13 August 2010
This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2008) |
Critique is the disciplined, systematic analysis of a written or oral discourse. Critique differs from (is not) criticism in that critique is never personalized nor ad hominem, but is the analyses of the structure of the thought in the content of the item critiqued, and which then offers either a rebuttal or a suggestion of further expansion of the problems presented by the topic that specific written or oral argumentation. The term critique derives from the Greek term kritikē (κριτική), meaning "(the art of) discerning", that is, discerning the value of persons or things. Critique is an accepted and established process of scholarly debate. In the fine arts and the humanities, and especially in writing, critique is influenced by the scientific method of analysis.
Philosophy
In philosophical contexts it is influenced by Kant's use of the term to mean a reflective examination of the validity and limits of a human capacity or of a set of philosophical claims and has been extended in modern philosophy to mean a systematic inquiry into the conditions and consequences of a concept, theory, discipline, or approach and an attempt to understand its limitations and validity. A critical perspective, in this sense, is the opposite of a dogmatic one. Kant wrote:
- We deal with a concept dogmatically ... if we consider it as contained under another concept of the object which constitutes a principle of reason and determine it in conformity with this. But we deal with it merely critically if we consider it only in reference to our cognitive faculties and consequently to the subjective conditions of thinking it, without undertaking to decide anything about its object[1].
Later thinkers used the word critique, in a broader version of Kant's sense of the word, to mean the systematic inquiry into the limits of a doctrine or set of concepts. This referential expansion led to the idea of social critique, especially through Karl Marx's theoretical work in his Introduction to the critique of political economy (1859). Marx's work inspired the 'Frankfurt School' of critical theory, now best exemplified in the work of Jürgen Habermas. This, in turn, helped inspire the cultural studies form of social critique, which treats cultural products and their reception as evidence of wider social ills such as racism or gender bias. Social critique has been further extended in the work of Michel Foucault and of Alasdair MacIntyre. In their different and radically contrasting ways, MacIntyre and Foucault go well beyond the original Kantian meaning of the term critique in contesting legitimatory accounts of social power.
The idea of critique is also important in aesthetic and literary theory. Formal and casual criticisms of a work (a poem, a painting, or a play, for example) often use the term "critique" more loosely to refer to any argument about the quality of the work, typically through reference to popular expectations or conventions of the genre. Many philosophers prefer to distinguish such "weak" critiques (supported by arguments from induction, testimony, appeals to authority or to emotion, consensus, chain of improbabilities (e.g., butterfly effect), or appeals to analogy) from "strong critiques" that rely only on deduction, mathematical proof, and formal logic. Both types of critiques find expression in academic essays, policy position papers, trade journals, periodicals, political and religious leaflets, civic testimony, and judicial cross examination.
Reference
- ^ Emmanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment section 74.