Jump to content

User talk:67.136.117.132: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Are you...: new section
Are you...: added comment
Line 24: Line 24:


SPUI? Or Jossi (in which case I'd have to block you)? Or someone else... hm. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:85%;">—[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">fetch</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">·</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">comms</span>]]</span>''' 21:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
SPUI? Or Jossi (in which case I'd have to block you)? Or someone else... hm. '''<span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:85%;">—[[User:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">fetch</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">·</span>]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|<span style="color:black">comms</span>]]</span>''' 21:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
:I am neither. I'm someone else. [[Special:Contributions/67.136.117.132|67.136.117.132]] ([[User talk:67.136.117.132#top|talk]]) 14:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:23, 16 August 2010




RfC on bureaucrat removal

Hi. I've started the RfC on bureaucrat removal here. Thanks again for expressing your interest. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. 67.136.117.132 (talk) 15:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SNOW

For closing RFAs, "SNOW" has been largely deprecated by WP:NOTNOW as being less bitey (compare: "your RFA doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing" to "your RFA has been closed because you are not quite ready"... Might think about amending that. Cheers, –xenotalk 15:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know. But SNOW is still used in about 25% of the "forced withdrawals" this year. I changed it though, after considering the very few edits the candidate has. 67.136.117.132 (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed. It's an edumucation thing =) [Sometimes snow is still appropriate, when 'notnow' would be patronizing, but in these cases it's usually better to suggest the user withdraw]xenotalk 15:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Wait, is that your 'alt acct'? (P.S. I pasted this onto both pages in case you didn't get the message.) :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, one is my IP at home, the other is at work. The 174 address is dynamic, though, so it changes every couple of weeks or so. This one is static. 67.136.117.132 (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it's nothing. I wish more people like me would take the time to welcome their fellow IPs, though. They're too busy writing articles to realize that some of us are human. After all, there are no vested contributors and all editors are equal. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 16:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you...

SPUI? Or Jossi (in which case I'd have to block you)? Or someone else... hm. fetch·comms 21:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am neither. I'm someone else. 67.136.117.132 (talk) 14:23, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]