Talk:Zinc–air battery: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
BerserkerBen (talk | contribs) ; |
BerserkerBen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Well thank you for discovering this, 2 problems |
:Well thank you for discovering this, 2 problems |
||
:1. The electrochemistry is erroneous, with two sites stating different reactions, it could be that several different zinc air reactions types exist. |
:1. The electrochemistry is erroneous, with two sites stating different reactions, it could be that several different zinc air reactions types exist. [http://www.powerstream.com/BatteryFAQ.html] [https://www.technologyreview.com/articles/01/09/visualize0901.asp] |
||
:2. Zinc-Air Fuel Cells has a reaction of its own. |
:2. Zinc-Air Fuel Cells has a reaction of its own. [http://www.fctec.com/fctec_types_zafc.asp] |
||
I think all of these reactions need to be displayed, but information is needed for why they are different. --[[User:BerserkerBen|BerserkerBen]] 06:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC) |
:I think all of these reactions need to be displayed, but information is needed for why they are different. --[[User:BerserkerBen|BerserkerBen]] 06:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:17, 3 February 2006
The reaction at the anode is obviously wrong because the charges don't add up. I'd correct it but I don't know the correct reaction. --Alistair
- Well thank you for discovering this, 2 problems
- 1. The electrochemistry is erroneous, with two sites stating different reactions, it could be that several different zinc air reactions types exist. [1] [2]
- 2. Zinc-Air Fuel Cells has a reaction of its own. [3]
- I think all of these reactions need to be displayed, but information is needed for why they are different. --BerserkerBen 06:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)