User talk:Nehrams2020

RE:Sherlock Holmes Baffled

Haha, I'd already pre-empted someone might suggest that. I've made a little silent copy, so I can perhaps have a go at converting that to the weird ogv format today. Bob talk 08:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I've added a copy of it to the article. It works fine in Firefox, but seems to have a buffer problem in IE8 (although I've never really got ogv files to work on that browser). I'm not sure if the bitrate might be fairly high (although as a file, it's only 2MB). Bob talk 09:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Road to the Multiverse FAC

Thank you for taking the time to look over Road to the Multiverse. I've attempted to resolve all of your concerns, but I did leave you one question on the page. Thanks. Gage (talk) 19:51, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Satya review

I see that you reviewed Satya (film) back in February and rated it a C. I didn't expect it to qualify for a B based on "grammar and style" (it's pedestrian at best) but I am surprised about it failing the citation/ references criteria. As far as I can say, over 90% of the references are to mainstream publications (or "convenience links"), and where they are not, to blogs of individuals actually involved in the production of the film (writer/ director). There are a couple of dodgy/ broken links which can be fixed.

I would like to have a general idea of what it is that is missing/ not correct. Last Contrarian (talk) 11:16, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Home of the brave.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Home of the brave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

• News and notes: Book publisher apologizes for plagiarizing photos by Wikipedians, brief news

• Spam attacks: Large scale vandalism revealed to be "study" by university researcher

• In the news: Supportive communication and missing incentives on Wikipedia, and more

• WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Get Low (film) references addendum

Hi

Your handle says Nehrams 2020 but I am not sure if that is your name. I left this message with Bearcat and Cinemaniac86 but perhaps they are no longer involved in the maintenance of the page on the Get Low film.

I noticed there were only a handful of references/external links about Get Low, the Sony Pictures Classics small budget film currently in release.

There is a video editorial online on Get Low that may interest Wikipedia in referencing the content. It's really well made and if after reviewing it you may think it is worthwhile adding the reference to the list of sources that have produced editorials, essay or content related to the film.

http://midnighttracks.net/2010/getlowvid

Hope this helps in some way and hopefully it is not scorching hot in San Diego this time of year.

CinemaFanCA

76.170.118.23 (talk) 00:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Get Low - A reference worth evaluating

Nehrems 2020,

Thank you for the encouragement but the WP guidelines you mentioned are a little over my head. I just thought the editors that put the Get Low page on wikipedia may find this video editorial interesting and worth referencing in the section on references/external links, that is if some of you would view the video and decide amongst yourselves.

From my experiences with wikipedia simply editing or adding a section for someone who is not a long-time editor is a waste time since someone like me is neither familiar with all the guidelines and any contribution is considered by some editors as vandalism.

The best thing is simply to point out some possibilities to you guys and let you decide on it amongst yourselves. For this reason I left a notice with Bearcat, Cinemaniac86 (?) and another person besides you who all worked on producing the Get Low page.

I'd be curious to see what comes out of this if any.

I believe the video editorial has copyrights from Sony and the editorial producer who put together the storyline for the film/commentary.

Thanks and best,

76.170.118.23 (talk) 10:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)