Jump to content

Political Parties: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Quotes: Added another quote.
m Cleaned up using AutoEd
Line 4: Line 4:


==Quotes==
==Quotes==
*"Who says organization, says oligarchy."
* "Who says organization, says oligarchy."
* "A party of the landed gentry which should appeal only to the members of its own class and to those of identical economic interests, would not win a single seat, would not send a single representative to parliament. A conservative candidate who should present himself to his electors by declaring to them that he did not regard them as capable of playing an active part in influencing the destinies of the country, and should tell them that for this reason they ought to be deprived of the suffrage, would be a man of incomparable sincerity, but politically insane."

*"A party of the landed gentry which should appeal only to the members of its own class and to those of identical economic interests, would not win a single seat, would not send a single representative to parliament. A conservative candidate who should present himself to his electors by declaring to them that he did not regard them as capable of playing an active part in influencing the destinies of the country, and should tell them that for this reason they ought to be deprived of the suffrage, would be a man of incomparable sincerity, but politically insane."


==See also==
==See also==
*[[elite theory]]
* [[elite theory]]
*[[Union Democracy]]
* [[Union Democracy]]
*''[[The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism]]''
* ''[[The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism]]''


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
*Gordon Hands, ''[http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0007-1234(197104)1%3A2%3C155%3ARMATSO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-K Roberto Michels and the Study of Political Parties ]'', British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Apr., 1971), pp. 155-172, [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0007-1234(197104)1%3A2%3C155%3ARMATSO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-K JSTOR]
* Gordon Hands, ''[http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0007-1234(197104)1%3A2%3C155%3ARMATSO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-K Roberto Michels and the Study of Political Parties ]'', British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Apr., 1971), pp. 155-172, [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0007-1234(197104)1%3A2%3C155%3ARMATSO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-K JSTOR]


==External links==
==External links==
*[http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/MicPoli.html Political Parties, Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library]
* [http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/MicPoli.html Political Parties, Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library]
*[http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/michels/ Robert Michels index], a site featuring a translation of ''Political Parties'' by [[Eden Paul|Eden]] and [[Cedar Paul]] in [[PDF]].
* [http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/michels/ Robert Michels index], a site featuring a translation of ''Political Parties'' by [[Eden Paul|Eden]] and [[Cedar Paul]] in [[PDF]].


{{poli-book-stub}}
{{poli-book-stub}}

Revision as of 18:57, 23 August 2010

Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy is a book by sociologist Robert Michels, published in 1911 (translated to English in 1915), and first introducing the concept of iron law of oligarchy. It is considered one of the classics of sociology and political science.

This work analyzes the power structures of organizations such as political parties and trade unions. Michels's main argument is that like all organizations, even those in theory most egalatarian and most committed to democracy - like socialist political parties - are in fact oligarchical, and dominated by a small group of leadership.

Quotes

  • "Who says organization, says oligarchy."
  • "A party of the landed gentry which should appeal only to the members of its own class and to those of identical economic interests, would not win a single seat, would not send a single representative to parliament. A conservative candidate who should present himself to his electors by declaring to them that he did not regard them as capable of playing an active part in influencing the destinies of the country, and should tell them that for this reason they ought to be deprived of the suffrage, would be a man of incomparable sincerity, but politically insane."

See also

Further reading