Jump to content

Dickey–Wicker Amendment: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Wavy (talk | contribs)
Added Sherley vs Sebelius ruling ~~~~
Wavy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
:(b) For purposes of this section, the term "human embryo or embryos" includes any organism, not protected as a human subject under 45 CFR 46 (the Human Subject Protection regulations) . . . that is derived by [[fertilization]], [[parthenogenesis]], [[cloning]], or any other means from one or more human [[gametes]] ([[spermatozoon|sperm]] or [[ovum|egg]]) or human [[diploid]] cells (cells that have two sets of [[chromosome]]s, such as [[somatic]] cells).
:(b) For purposes of this section, the term "human embryo or embryos" includes any organism, not protected as a human subject under 45 CFR 46 (the Human Subject Protection regulations) . . . that is derived by [[fertilization]], [[parthenogenesis]], [[cloning]], or any other means from one or more human [[gametes]] ([[spermatozoon|sperm]] or [[ovum|egg]]) or human [[diploid]] cells (cells that have two sets of [[chromosome]]s, such as [[somatic]] cells).


Despite the March 9, 2009, executive order from President Obama, which removed the restriction against federal funding of stem cell research, the Wicker-Dickey Amendment remains an obstacle for federally-funded researchers seeking to create their own stem cell lines.<ref>{{cite news | title = Obama's Stem Cell Policy Hasn't Reversed Legislative Restrictions | publisher = [[Fox News]] | date = 2009-03-14 | url = http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/14/obamas-approval-stem-cell-research-needs-congressional-action/ | accessdate = 2009-03-30 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = Stolberg | first = Sheryl | title = Obama Is Leaving Some Stem Cell Issues to Congress | publisher = [[The New York Times]] | date = 2009-03-08 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/us/politics/09stem.html?_r=2 | accessdate = 2009-03-30 }}</ref> Indeed, in August 2010, in ''Sherley vs Sebelius'', Judge Royce Lambert granted an injunction against federally funded ESC research on the grounds that the guidelines for ESC research "clearly violate" the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.<ref>{{Citation/make link|https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2009cv1575-44|DC Court ruling}}</ref>
Despite the March 9, 2009, executive order from President Obama, which removed the restriction against federal funding of stem cell research, the Wicker-Dickey Amendment remains an obstacle for federally-funded researchers seeking to create their own stem cell lines.<ref>{{cite news | title = Obama's Stem Cell Policy Hasn't Reversed Legislative Restrictions | publisher = [[Fox News]] | date = 2009-03-14 | url = http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/14/obamas-approval-stem-cell-research-needs-congressional-action/ | accessdate = 2009-03-30 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = Stolberg | first = Sheryl | title = Obama Is Leaving Some Stem Cell Issues to Congress | publisher = [[The New York Times]] | date = 2009-03-08 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/us/politics/09stem.html?_r=2 | accessdate = 2009-03-30 }}</ref> Indeed, in August 2010, in ''Sherley vs Sebelius'', Judge [[Royce C. Lamberth]] granted an injunction against federally funded ESC research on the grounds that the guidelines for ESC research "clearly violate" the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.<ref>{{Citation/make link|https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2009cv1575-44|DC Court ruling}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 06:39, 24 August 2010

The Dickey Amendment (also known as the Dickey-Wicker Amendment) is the name of an appropriation's bill rider attached to a bill passed by United States Congress in 1995, and signed by former President Bill Clinton which prohibits the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from using appropriated funds for the creation of human embryos for research purposes or for research in which human embryos are destroyed. HHS funding includes the funding for National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. Technically the Dickey Amendment is a "rider" to other legislation, which amends the original legislation. The rider receives its name from the name of the Congressman that originally introduced the amendment, Representative Jay Dickey. The Dickey amendment language has been added to each of the Labor, HHS, and Education appropriations acts for FY1997 through FY2009. The original rider can be found in Section 128 of P.L. 104-99 [1] The wording of the rider is generally the same year after year. For FY2009, the wording in Division F, Section 509 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, [2] enacted March 11, 2009) prohibits HHS, including NIH, from using FY2009 appropriated funds as follows:

SEC. 509. (a) None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for--
(1) the creation of a human embryo or embryos for research purposes; or
(2) research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death greater than that allowed for research on fetuses in utero under 45 CFR 46.208(a)(2) and Section 498(b) of the Public Health Service Act [1](42 U.S.C. 289g(b)) (Title 42, Section 289g(b), United States Code).
(b) For purposes of this section, the term "human embryo or embryos" includes any organism, not protected as a human subject under 45 CFR 46 (the Human Subject Protection regulations) . . . that is derived by fertilization, parthenogenesis, cloning, or any other means from one or more human gametes (sperm or egg) or human diploid cells (cells that have two sets of chromosomes, such as somatic cells).

Despite the March 9, 2009, executive order from President Obama, which removed the restriction against federal funding of stem cell research, the Wicker-Dickey Amendment remains an obstacle for federally-funded researchers seeking to create their own stem cell lines.[3][4] Indeed, in August 2010, in Sherley vs Sebelius, Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted an injunction against federally funded ESC research on the grounds that the guidelines for ESC research "clearly violate" the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ "P.L. 104-99" (HTML). Thomas H.R.2880. The Library of Congress. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
  2. ^ "Public Law No. 111-8" (HTML). Thomas H.R.1105. The Library of Congress. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
  3. ^ "Obama's Stem Cell Policy Hasn't Reversed Legislative Restrictions". Fox News. 2009-03-14. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
  4. ^ Stolberg, Sheryl (2009-03-08). "Obama Is Leaving Some Stem Cell Issues to Congress". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
  5. ^ DC Court ruling