User talk:Stacyjj: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:40, 10 September 2010

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Edward Hirsch, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Edward Hirsch was changed by Stacyjj (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-08-24T18:27:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link canvassing

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:56, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Connormah (talk) 22:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{tlx|unblock| I am not spamming. I am adding links to lectures done by speakers from the Forum Network site.}

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 <div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''' from editing because your account is being used only for [[Wikipedia:Spam|spamming or advertising]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Connormah|Connormah]] ([[User talk:Connormah|talk]]) 22:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block-onlyfor -->
 [[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for advertising|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:Uw-soablock}} -->
+{tlx|unblock| I am not spamming. I am adding links to lectures done by speakers from the Forum Network site.}