Ancient church orders: Difference between revisions
→Texts and their relationship: more clear |
added a ref for the term "living literature" |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Living Literature== |
==Living Literature== |
||
To indicate the way of development of the Ancient Church Orders the term ''"living literature"'' has been proposed by M. Metzger and [[Paul F. Bradshaw]] (and others) in order to note that these texts, of which only a part survived, were updated and amended generation after generation, mixing ancient parts with materials from the contemporary uses and tradition of the copyists and removing what no more in line with the current understanding. Moreover it is probable also that in many cases the copyists were not describing their current or more ancient uses, but what they considered to be the best practice<ref name="Woolfenden"/>, thus for example describing liturgies never performed. This kind of literature allows the scholars, after a process of evaluation, to look at the liturgies of the 3rd and 4th century, but it makes difficult to use these texts to describe more ancient liturgies. |
To indicate the way of development of the Ancient Church Orders the term ''"living literature"''<ref>{{cite book|first=Allie M. |last=Ernst |title=Martha from the Margins: The Authority of Martha in Early Christian Tradition |date=2009 |isbn=9789004174900 |publisher=Brill | pages=225 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=BdioD9Wb0lgC&pg=PA225#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> has been proposed by M. Metzger and [[Paul F. Bradshaw]] (and others) in order to note that these texts, of which only a part survived, were updated and amended generation after generation, mixing ancient parts with materials from the contemporary uses and tradition of the copyists and removing what no more in line with the current understanding. Moreover it is probable also that in many cases the copyists were not describing their current or more ancient uses, but what they considered to be the best practice<ref name="Woolfenden"/>, thus for example describing liturgies never performed. This kind of literature allows the scholars, after a process of evaluation, to look at the liturgies of the 3rd and 4th century, but it makes difficult to use these texts to describe more ancient liturgies. |
||
It is possible to outline also some development patterns for the content of this literature: the more ancient texts, as Didache, are mainly concerned about moral conduct, giving a very few room to liturgy and to Church organization. Later on the interest on moral issues waned and liturgy became prominent. In the last documents, the focus moved mainly on the Church organization and to the canon law. Starting since the 5th century, the Ancient Church Orders ceased to be regarded authoritative,<ref name="Bradshaw"/> in spite of their higher and higher claimed level of [[pseudepigraph]]y, and were substituted by the canons of [[Ecumenical council|councils]] and [[synod]]s and by [[Sacramentary|sacramentaries]] of famous bishops. |
It is possible to outline also some development patterns for the content of this literature: the more ancient texts, as Didache, are mainly concerned about moral conduct, giving a very few room to liturgy and to Church organization. Later on the interest on moral issues waned and liturgy became prominent. In the last documents, the focus moved mainly on the Church organization and to the canon law. Starting since the 5th century, the Ancient Church Orders ceased to be regarded authoritative,<ref name="Bradshaw"/> in spite of their higher and higher claimed level of [[pseudepigraph]]y, and were substituted by the canons of [[Ecumenical council|councils]] and [[synod]]s and by [[Sacramentary|sacramentaries]] of famous bishops. |
Revision as of 18:13, 11 September 2010
Ancient Church Orders is a genre of early Christian literature, ranging from 1st to 5th century AD, which has the aim to offer authoritative "apostolic" prescriptions on matters of moral conduct, liturgy and Church organization.[1]. These text are extremely important in the study of early liturgy and served as the basis for much ancient ecclesiastical legislation.
A characteristic of this genre is their pseudepigraph form. Many of them profess to have been handed down by the Twelve Apostles. In the earliest of them, the Didache, this fiction only extends to the title: The teaching of the Lord to the Gentiles by the Twelve Apostles, in other this fiction is much more thoroughgoing. The later Testamentum Domini arrives to declare to be the legacy left by Jesus Christ himself to his Apostles before the Ascension, and to give his own words and commands as to the government of the Church.[2] A part from the Apostolic Constitutions, which was printed since 1563, all other texts have been discovered and published in the 19th or early 20th century.
Texts and their relationship
Church Orders were mutually interrelated documents and ofter circulated in collections.[3] It is easy to point out many direct literal relationships among sections of them. Different scholars since the early 20th century have suggested extremely different historical orders of interrelation. Nowadays the universally accepted family tree contains two roots, and can be so summarized according to Bradshaw:[1]
- Didache, or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, (1st-2nd century, Syria), from which depend
- Didascalia Apostolorum (about 230 AD, Syria)
- Apostolic Church-Ordinance, or Apostolic Church-Order, (about 300 AD, Egypt)
- Apostolic Tradition[4] (3rd or 4th century AD, probably Syria), published in the 19th century under the tile of Egyptian Church Order, from which depend
- Canons of Hippolytus (336-340 AD, Egypt)
- Testamentum Domini (?5th century, Syria)
There are other minor texts belonging to the genre of the Ancient Church Orders: the Coptic Canons of Basil (an Egyptian 4th century text based mainly on the Canons of Hippolytus) and the Western Statuta Eccesiae Antiqua (about 490 AD, probably composed by Gennadius of Massilia and based on both Apostolic Tradition and Apostolic Constitutions).[1]
It shall be noted that usually the Church Orders were transmitted in collection with the same order of materials, even if sometime free rendered mixed with additional material. The more ancient collection is formed by Didascalia - Didache - Apostolic Tradition, later on the Apostolic Church-Ordinance took the place of the Didache in the second position and in even later manuscripts the Testamentum Domini took the place of the Didascalia in the first position and the book 8 of the Apostolic Constitutions took the place of the Apostolic Tradition in the last position, thus we find Testamentum Domini - Apostolic Church-Ordinance - book 8 of the Apostolic Constitutions.[1]
The main collections of Church Orders are the following:[5]
- the Apostolic Constitutions (about 380 AD, Syria) is a collection of eight books depending mainly from the Didascalia Apostolorum (books 1-6), from the Didache (book 7) and from the Apostolic Tradition (book 8). Its final chapter is known as the Canons of the Apostles and had a wider circulation than the rest of the Apostolic Constitutions
- the Fragmentum Veronese, or Verona Palimpsest[6], first published in 1900 by Edmund Hauler, contains Latin free versions of the Didascalia Apostolorum, Apostolic Church-Ordinance and the Egyptian Church Order
- the Alexandrine Sinodos is extant in Ge'ez, Bohairic Coptic, Sahidic Coptic and Arabic versions and is a collection based on the Apostolic Church-Ordinance, the Apostolic Tradition and the eighth book of the Apostolic Constitutions. It was particularly used in the ancient Coptic Christianity. The Bohairic version was published in 1848 by Henry Tattam and the Sahidic text was published in 1883 by Paul de Lagarde
- the Clementine Octateuch is extant in Syriac and Arabic versions, and it is a collection of the Testamentum Domini, the Apostolic Church-Ordinance, the Apostolic Tradition (included only in the Arabic version) and the eighth book of the Apostolic Constitutions.
Living Literature
To indicate the way of development of the Ancient Church Orders the term "living literature"[7] has been proposed by M. Metzger and Paul F. Bradshaw (and others) in order to note that these texts, of which only a part survived, were updated and amended generation after generation, mixing ancient parts with materials from the contemporary uses and tradition of the copyists and removing what no more in line with the current understanding. Moreover it is probable also that in many cases the copyists were not describing their current or more ancient uses, but what they considered to be the best practice[3], thus for example describing liturgies never performed. This kind of literature allows the scholars, after a process of evaluation, to look at the liturgies of the 3rd and 4th century, but it makes difficult to use these texts to describe more ancient liturgies.
It is possible to outline also some development patterns for the content of this literature: the more ancient texts, as Didache, are mainly concerned about moral conduct, giving a very few room to liturgy and to Church organization. Later on the interest on moral issues waned and liturgy became prominent. In the last documents, the focus moved mainly on the Church organization and to the canon law. Starting since the 5th century, the Ancient Church Orders ceased to be regarded authoritative,[1] in spite of their higher and higher claimed level of pseudepigraphy, and were substituted by the canons of councils and synods and by sacramentaries of famous bishops.
Notes
- ^ a b c d e Bradshaw, Paul F. (2002). The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship. Oxford University Press. pp. 73ss. ISBN 9780195217322.
- ^ Maclean, Arthur John (1910). The Ancient Church Orders. Cambridge University Press. p. 3.
- ^ a b Woolfenden, Gregory W. (2004). Daily liturgical prayer: origins and theology. Ashgate Publishing. p. 23. ISBN 9780754616016.
- ^ Johnson, Lawrence J. (2009). Worship in the Early Church: An Anthology of Historical Sources. Vol 1. Liturgical Press. p. 193. ISBN 9780814661970.
- ^ Steimer, Bruno (1992). Vertex traditionis: die Gattung der altchristlichen Kirchenordnungen. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 6–7. ISBN 9783110134605.
- ^ Codex Veronensis LV, olim 53
- ^ Ernst, Allie M. (2009). Martha from the Margins: The Authority of Martha in Early Christian Tradition. Brill. p. 225. ISBN 9789004174900.
Sources
- Bradshaw, Paul F. (2002). The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195217322.
- Steimer, Bruno (1992). Vertex traditionis: die Gattung der altchristlichen Kirchenordnungen. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110134605.
- Maclean, Arthur John (1910). The Ancient Church Orders. Cambridge University Press.
- Johnson, Lawrence J. (2009). Worship in the Early Church: An Anthology of Historical Sources. Vol 1. Liturgical Press. ISBN 9780814661970.
- Senn, Frank C, (1997). Christian Liturgy, Catholic and Evangelical. Augsburg Fortress. p. 111. ISBN 0800627261.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. {{cite encyclopedia}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(help)