Talk:Halfway Gone/GA3: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
re |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:::That's true, but the live performances sections in those articles are far more comprehensive than the one here. [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 23:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
:::That's true, but the live performances sections in those articles are far more comprehensive than the one here. [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 23:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
*If you're going to imply words in a quote, try to use something more formal than 'to do'. Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. {{done}} |
*If you're going to imply words in a quote, try to use something more formal than 'to do'. Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. {{done}} |
||
*Can you find some more professional reviews? Try searching for reviews for ''Smoke and Mirrors'', and see if there are any comments on "Halfway Gone". |
*Can you find some more professional reviews? Try searching for reviews for ''Smoke and Mirrors'', and see if there are any comments on "Halfway Gone". {{done}} |
||
*{{!xt|"resulted in 'a fresh sound for Lifehouse as the band aims to extend its run on the hot AC and Billboard Hot 100 charts.'"}} - explain this quote; what are these charts? Provide links, maybe? {{done}} |
*{{!xt|"resulted in 'a fresh sound for Lifehouse as the band aims to extend its run on the hot AC and Billboard Hot 100 charts.'"}} - explain this quote; what are these charts? Provide links, maybe? {{done}} |
||
*The second paragraph of 'Chart performance' needs wikifying {{done}} |
*The second paragraph of 'Chart performance' needs wikifying {{done}} |
Revision as of 23:51, 17 September 2010
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I am willing to put the review on hold, but there is still a bit of work to do
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- "These remixes of the song are called..." - not needed in lead Done
- "charting in countries that included...among other countries" - a bit doubled up Done
- You probably don't need to mention the specifics of live performances in the lead Not sure
- I have seen many good articles, such as: U Smile and Poker Face, that include specifics of the artist's live performances in the lead. Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- That's true, but the live performances sections in those articles are far more comprehensive than the one here. Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have seen many good articles, such as: U Smile and Poker Face, that include specifics of the artist's live performances in the lead. Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- If you're going to imply words in a quote, try to use something more formal than 'to do'. Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. Done
- Can you find some more professional reviews? Try searching for reviews for Smoke and Mirrors, and see if there are any comments on "Halfway Gone". Done
- "resulted in 'a fresh sound for Lifehouse as the band aims to extend its run on the hot AC and Billboard Hot 100 charts.'" - explain this quote; what are these charts? Provide links, maybe? Done
- The second paragraph of 'Chart performance' needs wikifying Done
- Do the screenshots of the video really add anything to the article? Not sure
- The screenshots show an example of how people appear out of nowhere throughout the music video. Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- The 'Remixes' section needs a re-write: obviously Wade wrote all the remixes; this is not needed. Instead, just mention the release, names of mixers, and critical response. Done
- Not done, actually. Remove Wade's writing credits in the prose and mention the mixers. Morgan Page and Fred Falke are notable, so link to them. Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
- Some references aren't very reliable such as lifehousemusic.com. Try to find alternatives. Not sure
- Lifehousemusic.com is the official website for Lifehouse and is off of the Geffen Records website.
- The references' formats are looking much better, but please run through them again; only publications in print (ie newspapers, magazines) should be italicised. Done
- Have a look at some FAs like "4 Minutes" (Madonna song) and "Smells Like Teen Spirit" to get a good idea of these things Done
- WP:SAMPLE states that a music sample should be less than 10% of the original recording, and of a quality of about 64kbps; therefore File:Halfwaygone.ogg needs some work Done