Talk:Liverpool F.C.: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	May 2005 – May 2006; June 2006 – July 2006; July 2006 – January 2007; February 2007 – July 2010; July 2010 – ;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:27, 18 September 2010

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liverpool F.C. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 3 months

Liverpool F.C. has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 13, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 11, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
January 4, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
March 8, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
April 17, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
April 20, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
June 28, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
October 14, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
December 23, 2007	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
January 14, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
December 5, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
January 6, 2009	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
June 8, 2009	Good article reassessment	Listed
August 27, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
August 28, 2010	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
Current status: Good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Merseyside Top‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WikiProject Superleague Formula

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Football: England / Liverpool High‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Liverpool task force (assessed as High-importance).

Template:FAOL

Tip: #section links are case-sensitive on most browsers

Links from this article with broken #section links :
[[Hat-trick#Soccer .28European and Latin American Football.29|hat tricks]]

You can remove this template after fixing the problems | FAQ | Report a problem

Edit request from vicktah, 10 August 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Change "Liverpool Football Club are a professional football club who play in the Premier League and are the joint most successful team in the history of English football, with no other club having won more trophies." to "Liverpool Football Club are a professional football club who play in the Premier League and are the joint most successful team in the history of English football, only Manchester United having won as many trophies." Vicktah (talk) 13:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 92.2.116.123, 30 June 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Hodgson is spelt wrong in manager

92.2.116.123 (talk) 11:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you very much. {{Sonia|ping|enlist}} 11:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Need 87, 2 July 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} I have a suggestion for the home and away kit. As third kit ain't released yet, it's only marked as a question mark (should it temporarily be removed?):

Need 87 (talk) 18:05, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: It's a good idea, but when one does come along it's easier to already have the code instead of redoing it all. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 01:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Liverpool FC chairmen

In your opinion, is it possible to have a complete list of Liverpool FC chairmen? See none of them browsing on the web. Greetings. --87.6.119.114 (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World Cup winners

Roger Hunt, Pepe Reina and Fernando Torres are included, but the list should also include Gerry Byrne and Ian Callaghan, who were both in the 1966 England squad. Based on the fact that Reina is included, so should these two. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.83.167 (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.130.18 (talk) 16:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suitable for a featured article...?

As Liverpool FC is the most successful team in English football, has been extensively covered in the press recently (due to its impending sale and recent troubles) and the article itself is concise and well written - This article seems to fit the guidelines for a featured article. Could someone who knows how to nominate articles nominate this one... please!86.181.53.40 (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no way this article is at FA standards I'm afraid. They are very exacting about stuff! Ged UK 17:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does the FA have to do with it (presuming you are referring to the football association) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.180.82.245 (talk) 10:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, the Featured Article (FA) standards. Ged UK 10:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 169: / Line 169: @@
 What does the FA have to do with it (presuming you are referring to the football association)  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.180.82.245|86.180.82.245]] ([[User talk:86.180.82.245|talk]]) 10:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :No, the Featured Article (FA) standards. [[User:Ged UK|<font color="green">Ged</font>]][[User talk:Ged UK|<font color="orange">'''''UK'''''</font>&nbsp;]] 10:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
+== Sponsors ==
+Should there be a section in the article that talks about their sponsors because there is nothing about their sponsors in the article.